0612GrazingImprovementActPassesCommitteesr.cfm Malatya Haber Grazing Improvement Act passes House Natural Resources Committee
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal
Commerical Hay Equipment For The Farm
Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizer



Farm Survey


AgriMartin
Journal Getaways


Reader Comment:
by ohio bo

"An excellent essay on fairs that brought back many memories for me. In my part"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


Grazing Improvement Act passes House Natural Resources Committee

The House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources on June 12 advanced the Grazing Improvement Act (H.R. 657) on a bipartisan vote of 27 to 15. The legislation, which seeks to improve the livestock grazing permitting processes on lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service, will now go to the full House for consideration.

H.R. 657 was introduced in February by Rep. Raúl Labrador, R-ID, as companion legislation to S. 258 in the Senate, also introduced in February by Sen. John Barrasso, R-WY. Public Lands Council Executive Director and Director of Federal Lands for National Cattlemen’s Beef Association Dustin Van Liew said the Grazing Improvement Act will contribute greatly to providing a stable business environment to federal lands ranchers who face increasing uncertainty as to the future of their livestock grazing permits.

The legislation proposes to increase the term of grazing permits from 10 to 20 years, so that the burdens of National Environmental Policy Act review of expired permits will be reduced, thereby giving ranchers increased certainty that they may continue grazing and their operations will remain viable. Among other provisions to reduce the NEPA burden, the bill also proposes to codify longstanding appropriations language that would allow grazing to continue under existing terms and conditions while the NEPA backlog is being addressed.

“We greatly appreciate the leadership of Rep. Labrador and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Hastings for their leadership on this important issue,” Van Liew said. “Ranchers can no longer afford the incredible regulatory and litigious environment created by excessive application of NEPA. If we lose ranchers, we lose the stewards of the land, job providers in the West, and a crucial part of American livestock production. Like last year, we look forward to passage through the House this session.”

During the committee’s consideration of the bill, two amendments were offered. An amendment by Labrador, which passed, would exempt range improvements from excessive and unnecessary environmental review and clarify the intent of Congress with regard to who may appeal agency grazing decisions. Van Liew said the amendment will prevent radical environmental groups from abusing the current appeals system, and further reduce the NEPA burden. He said this amendment is especially important at a time when wildfire has ravaged hundreds of miles of fence and many range improvements crucial to the proper care of livestock and the range.

An amendment introduced by Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-AZ, which would have imposed an arbitrary 74 percent increase of the federal lands grazing fee on ranchers, failed. The amendment’s alleged purpose was to “offset the increased cost of administering the livestock grazing program.” However, Van Liew asserted that this fee increase would likely decrease revenue to the government by forcing ranchers out of business. He added that the “increased cost” Grijalva mentions is due to overregulation and predatory litigation by radical anti-grazing groups.

“We are pleased that, once again, the proposal to increase the grazing fee was soundly defeated. The current grazing fee is fair, is based on market criteria and accurately reflects the cost of operating on public lands. The effects of the loss of public lands grazing on both the environment and the local economies in the West would be devastating,” he said. “Altogether, the Grazing Improvement Act is now stronger than ever, and we look forward to seeing this commonsense legislation coming to a vote by the full House.”

PLC has represented livestock ranchers who use public lands since 1968, preserving the natural resources and unique heritage of the West. Public land ranchers own nearly 120 million acres of the most productive private land and manage vast areas of public land, accounting for critical wildlife habitat and the nation’s natural resources. PLC works to maintain a stable business environment in which livestock producers can conserve the West and feed the nation and world.

Date: 7/1/2013



Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Archives Search


Advertisement
NCBA Convention

United Sorghum Checkoff Program

Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives