Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal



Farm Survey


AgriMartin
Journal Getaways


Reader Comment:
by Greater Franklin County

"Thanks for picking up the story about our Buy One Product Local campaign --- we're"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

WTO backs U.S. in chicken trade dispute with China

Advertisement

WASHINGTON (AP)—The World Trade Organization has ruled in favor of the U.S. in a long-standing trade dispute over allegations China unfairly imposed anti-dumping tariffs that restricted American poultry exports.

The U.S. appeal to the WTO dates back to 2011 after China said that America had engaged in dumping and had imposed tariffs on imports of so-called “broiler products,” which include most chicken products with the exception of live chickens. China said U.S. chicken producers benefited from subsidies and were exporting their goods at unfairly low prices.

Countries are allowed to impose punitive tariffs to offset both practices, but U.S. officials claimed China did not follow proper procedures when it imposed them in September 2010. The U.S. also said tens of thousands of jobs were affected—China was one of the two top markets for U.S. chicken exports before the tariffs.

The ruling found that China breached its WTO obligations and recommended it comply with WTO rules. However, it did not specify the actions China must take. China is entitled to a period of time to comply with the rules and can also appeal the ruling.

U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said the ruling was a victory that he hopes will discourage further violations that hurt American exporters.

“WTO members must use trade remedies strictly in accordance with their commitments,” he said.

In a statement issued Aug. 2, China’s Ministry of Commerce said the panel report upheld some Chinese claims, and that Beijing will “seriously” evaluate the document and follow up in accordance with the procedures for settling disputes.

The chicken dispute is part of a larger set of strains in trade relations between the world’s twolargest economies.

The U.S. runs a larger trade deficit with China than with any other country in the world. The gap widened by 15.6 percent to $27.9 billion for the month of May alone—the most recent figures available. That was more than half of the total U.S. trade deficit of $45 billion with the whole world for that month and close to an all-time monthly high set in November. So far this year, the U.S. deficit with China is running 3 percent higher than last year.

One of the biggest disputes with China is over its currency. The U.S. accuses Beijing of under-valuing the yuan to gain a trade advantage by making its exports cheaper to drive up domestic growth rates. U.S. officials are pressing China to let the yuan exchange rate float freely against the dollar and shift more to an economy based on domestic consumption instead of relying on exports.

They are also urging China to enforce intellectual property rights and roll back subsidies for Chinese state-owned enterprises.

Siva Yam, president of the U.S.-China Chamber of Commerce, which primarily represents U.S. companies in China, said the WTO decision will not have much significance for the larger bilateral relationship and that it would continue to be fraught with trade disputes.

“I do not believe it will change the equation,” he said. “U.S. and China relations will continue to be up and down. ... I think the relationship will become more tense in the future, but not only because of this.”

He said the U.S. does not export much to China. But because China is one of the only markets in the world for chicken feet and internal chicken organs, it was seeking to gain leverage to counter U.S. dumping complaints against Beijing. He predicted China would now look for other levers to strike back against the U.S.

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said agricultural exports are a strong and growing component of U.S. exports. Farm exports in fiscal year 2012 reached $135.8 billion and supported 1 million American jobs, he said, adding that more than $23 billion worth of those agricultural products went to China alone.

“But China’s prohibitive duties on broiler products were followed by a steep decline in exports to China—and now we look forward to seeing China’s market for broiler products restored,” Vilsack said in a statement.

Date: 8/26/2013



Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Archives Search



Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives