Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Subscribe
High Plains Journal on Nook

AgriMartin
Journal Getaways
Reader Comment:
by Greater Franklin County

"Thanks for picking up the story about our Buy One Product Local campaign --- we're"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Farm Survey


Renewed optimism for a farm bill

By Seymour Klierly

In the days and weeks leading to the November election, there have been several key congressional leaders speaking out and being plain optimistic that a farm bill can be done in 2012. While there is a laundry list of tasks before the House, Senate, and the administration, the farm bill is continually mentioned in the to-do list discussions. While avoiding the fiscal cliff, a combination of automatic cuts to spending called sequestration and expiring tax rates, is the top priority that must be addressed by Congress before Jan. 1, perhaps the farm bill is second.

President Barack Obama appears to have won enough votes to continue for a second term. For at least the next two years, the House will continue to be controlled by Republicans and the Senate by Democrats. With such large issues facing the country and a divided Washington, D.C., signing a new farm bill into law could be the first bipartisan accomplishment after the election.

Before leaving for recess in August and October, the House of Representatives had the opportunity to take a stand-alone vote on the farm bill passed by the House Agriculture Committee. When the House did not, most blamed Eric Cantor, R-VA, for the hold-up. While campaigning for Rep. Raul Labrador, R-ID, Cantor said he "delayed action before the recess because we don't have the votes on the floor." Speaking of the lame duck, he pledged that "'I'm committed to bring the issue to the floor and then to see a way forward so we can get the votes to pass a farm bill."

Fellow House Republican, Rep. Adrian Smith, R-NE, also expects to act on the farm bill. An October news release by Smith said: "When Congress returns to Washington after the election, we have a long list of items to address before the end of the year. One of the biggest priorities, especially for Nebraska producers, will be passing a responsible farm bill to prevent a lapse in policy."

On the opposite side of the Capitol, there is also renewed optimism for progress. During a townhall meeting in central Kansas, Ranking Member of the Senate Agriculture Committee Pat Roberts, R-KS, said, "There's plenty left to be done when Congress returns after Tuesday's presidential election." When asked about the farm bill specifically, he replied, "'We will probably see that voted on right away. We will get a farm bill. We will get it done."

With Obama's successful reelection, lawmakers are more likely to hold a long lame-duck session to avert a national crisis. During negations for a grand bargain to avert the fiscal cliff, the farm bill may have a spot at the table. The optimism stemming from Republicans in both the House and Senate marks a growing movement to address the farm bill as soon as possible. Whether the signals by lawmakers the past few weeks were talking points or an actual shift in the landscape, only the lame-duck session this November and December will show.

Editor's note: Seymour Klierly writes Washington Whispers for the Journal from inside the Beltway.

Date: 11/12/2012


Click for related articles Renewed optimism for a farm bill
Records 1
Reader Comments
PowerOfChoice — 11/16/2012 01:11:54
Any Farm Bill should only be for farmers to insure proper food supply for citizens and that the farmers have access to proper insurance the same as any other business. This bill should not contain legislative garbage such as broadband, energy, housing, etc. which gets thrown into the bill by legislators many times to scratch their campaign donors backs. SNAP should stand alone in its own bill to better control costs or potential abuse and would eliminate the petty bickering such as now with Farm Needs vs. Food Stamps. The GOP also has an opportunity to fix problems regarding USDA programs.

Extending the Farm Bill, passing other bills such as House Bill H.R. 273 and H.R. 6416, or passing the Senate Farm Bill with SEC. 12211. DEFINITION OF RURAL AREA FOR PURPOSES OF THE HOUSING ACT OF 1949 will continue the corruption and abuse perpetrated to implement USDA Mutual Self Help Housing programs. What is happening in some areas is the land is being obtained by violating the rights of other citizens who have contracts and prior Vested Property Rights. Innocent citizens who have just purchased new homes are being faced with issues costing their families potentially $100,000+ either to fight legal battles or loss in equity potentially up to $150,000 per family regarding the number one most expensive item most citizens invest in their lifetime … a family home.

These include Legally Disabled Families who due to extra loss of equity in their homes may no longer be able to depend on equity to help with future emergency medical bills or potentially be able to do a reverse mortgage to supplement their retirement. These actions are legally, ethically, and morally wrong. You can take an Identity or cheap car and be arrested, but if you take and change documents attached to another person's property illegally there is no similar avenue for justice to prevail. This program would not exist if not for citizen’s tax dollars and citizens should not have their families harmed when implementing government programs.

When a program starts becoming corrupt and abusive harming innocent American Citizens is when it needs to possibly be eliminated. The alternative of NOT grandfathering rural communities will at least help potentially reduce the impact regarding current situations taking place and provide an opportunity to insure better oversight regarding this Federal Program.

The Senate Farm Bill would increase the pool of recipients and increased rural community population requirement to 35,000. This population would be a small City not a true rural community. Changing the Census date to 2020 insures those who already received fair share of benefits over past years and self-sufficient to continue receiving benefits. The purpose of rural programs is to help very small struggling communities grow and become self-sufficient, not to become a Welfare System for self-sufficient communities wanting more. To grandfather does not help us reduce our 16+ Trillion Dollar debt and it certainly does not help stop the financial harm being perpetrated against innocent hard working middle class Americans.

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


54 Recommend | 1 Comments

Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2013.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Search HPJ





Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives