Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

High Plains Journal on Nook
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Jeannette

"It was inevitable that someone as dedicated and as talented as Shannon Schur would take"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


Another attack

By Holly Martin

Another video released and another industry that has to spend time and effort defending its actions and standards. If it seems as though it is becoming more frequent--that's because it is.

I heard a few hours before the release of the video and press release that the Humane Society of the United States was planning a press conference. After having been through this before, I knew what to expect. And so did many in the agricultural community.

In today's environment of immediate "news," stories like this can spread quickly. I particularly watched Twitter because you can search any topic and see what is being said from all walks of life.

Interesting, I thought, how all of the tweets were exactly the same, "HSUS investigation reveals appalling animal cruelty. Speak out to pork companies." Come to find out, you don't even need to think to spread biased information for HSUS.

For those of you who aren't familiar with Twitter, many websites allow you to "share" something via Twitter. Usually, you click on the link and it allows you to comment. What HSUS did, instead, was provided their canned comment about "appalling animal cruelty."

My point is this: The agriculture industry is dealing with a very advanced foe. Not only do they have millions of dollars at their disposal, they also have perfected a model that brainwashes consumers in a way that they only have to click to spread misinformation. They don't even realize they are being manipulated.

It does not mean the agriculture industry is defeated. In fact, we are learning how to respond to these types of attacks.

Many farm and livestock organizations have extensive media training classes that help producers respond to questions when these stories surface. Producer organizations have response plans at the ready.

Many producers are being proactive, as well. They engage consumers in conversation--whether it be in person or digitally through social networks like Twitter and YouTube. Large farms also have response plans in the event that crisis--real or manufactured--happens. They are putting employees through animal care standards or hazardous chemical training.

These are the positive types of response that are needed. Many times our gut reaction is to lash out and maybe even cuss a little. But we simply can't. We need to know the facts about our industry and be able to engage in a calm discussion, no matter how passionately we feel.

First, we need to make sure our house is in order. Animal abuse can not be tolerated at any level. Employees must understand this and be evaluated to ensure standard are being met. Secondly, we must be ready to respond. Whether you are a rancher with 20 cows or 20,000, the responsibility is ours to provide facts to consumers.

We're getting better, but we're not there yet. More attacks to the agricultural industry will come. Let's work on our relationships with consumers now, so that when they do, it won't be so easy for them to be manipulated.

Holly Martin can be reached by phone at 1-800-452-7171 ext. 1806, or by email at hmartin@hpj.com .


Click for related articles Another attack
Another attack

Comments on Articles article 2012- 6 - 0201Editorialhmsr.cfm
Reader Comments
former hsus employee — 02/10/2012 09:02:42
"We don't want any of these animals to be raised and killed...unfortunately we don't have the luxury of waiting until we have the opportunity to get rid of the entire [animal agriculture] industry." – Vice President for farm animal issues Miyun Park, in a 2006 speech

“We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding ...One generation and out. We have no problems with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding.” – CEO Wayne Pacelle, as reported in Animal People News, May1993

“I don't want to see another cat or dog born.” – CEO Wayne Pacelle in Bloodties, 1994

“Eating meat causes animal cruelty.” – HSUS senior campaigner Paul Shapiro, in a 2003 speech

Reader Comments
Janet Weeks — 02/06/2012 06:02:48
HSUS Donor: "BirdLover" won't be able to supply sources where HSUS states their agenda is to eliminate animal agriculture, because the sources don't exist. These are fabrications to cast aspersions on HSUS, nothing more. Don't believe a word of it.

Reader Comments
HSUS Donor — 02/06/2012 04:02:26
Thank you, Janet, but I am actually looking for the sources where HSUS states they are after animal agriculture and they plan to eliminate it. Because I haven't been able to find anything like that anywhere.

I agree with the author of this column that animal abuse should not be tolerated at any level. From everything I know about HSUS, they work to try to make conditions for farm animals better and to make sure animals aren't abused, including on farms.

This is why I'm confused. If HSUS is working to make sure farm animals aren't abused, why would they be trying to eliminate animal agriculture. This doesn't make sense to me.

Also, why is it a bad thing for HSUS to expose bad farms. Now we know who they are, we can fix the problem.

Reader Comments
Janet Weeks — 02/06/2012 03:02:11
Dear HSUS Donor:

As a donor myself, I suggest you thoroughly acquaint yourself with HSUS’s outstanding website, starting with “About Us: Overview.”

http://www.humanesociety.org/about/overview/

Then, read up on your particular areas of interest or concern. For example, under “Our Policies,” you will find HSUS’s “Statement on Farm Animals and Eating with Conscience.”

http://www.humanesociety.org/about/policy_statements/our_policies_1.html

I also highly recommend you sign up for Wayne Pacelle’s excellent daily blog to follow what HSUS is up to on a daily basis. You can subscribe for free here:

http://hsus.typepad.com/wayne/2012/02/four-stars-charity-navigator.html

Also, do not miss Pacelle’s brilliant new book, The Bond: Our Kinship with Animals, Our Call to Defend Them.

http://hsus.typepad.com/wayne/2011/03/the-bond-book.html

I am sure after just a little time spent on research, you will conclude you have chosen to support the most powerful, most effective animal advocacy nonprofit there is. Those who would cast aspersions on HSUS's successful advocacy for animals are those industries who are thoroughly entrenched in exploiting animals for profit. HSUS threatens their bottom dollar. You can read about some of them here:

http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/opposition/opposition.html

Reader Comments
HSUS Donor — 02/06/2012 02:02:38
I've been donating to HSUS for years and I'm dismayed to hear that they stated that they are after animal agriculture. I've also never heard HSUS say that their agenda is to eliminate animal agriculture. In fact the opposite. Can you point me to the sources for those quotes, please? Because if this is true, everyone should know the truth.

Reader Comments
CanAmFam — 02/06/2012 12:02:40
LOL at this entire paranoid article. Also at elvbend's comments about special interests. Guess who one of the LARGEST special interests groups is in DC? Yep, Agribculture. They outspend and outlobby animal welfare by an orders of magnitude margin.

But here's a throught: how about farmers clean up our act, so there's no material for these videos?

Reader Comments
Janet Weeks — 02/06/2012 11:02:01
"The HSUS gets tangible results every day, we get the highest marks from our peers in animal protection and from third-party charity watchdogs, and we attract the ire of the largest and most entrenched animal-use groups in the world. That’s a pretty great track record, we think, and we hope you agree."- Wayne Pacelle

I do. Agree!

http://hsus.typepad.com/wayne/2012/02/four-stars-charity-navigator.html

Reader Comments
Janet Weeks — 02/06/2012 11:02:59
"But it’s also nice to look at the numbers and see how The HSUS compares to others in the nonprofit sector. That’s why I am glad to report that last week both The HSUS and Humane Society International received four stars, the highest rating, from Charity Navigator for their performance in the previous year. Charity Navigator is the nation’s foremost independent charity evaluator, and the four-star rating means that a charity 'outperforms most other charities in America.'” -- Wayne Pacelle

Reader Comments
elvbend — 02/04/2012 08:02:43
They're trying to devastate dog and cat breeders, and now they are after animal ag. What kind of world is this when a single radical special-interest group has so much control over our legislative process?

Reader Comments
BirdLover — 02/04/2012 07:02:02
This is going to be a long war. HSUS has stated that they are after animal agriculture. Their agenda is to eliminate animal agriculture, not improve it. Unless every animal producer fully recognizes that goal, it will be more difficult for our side to achieve success. I have seen the lawsuits, lobbying, and PR spectacles put on by HSUS for the past thirty years against all sorts of animal enterprises...and they fight dirty. The HSUS has done a lot of damage to other animal activities...so please, farmers and cattlemen, fight hard and never ever negotiate with HSUS. You are the stakeholders, they are not.

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


78 Recommend | 10 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2012.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ









Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives