Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

High Plains Journal on Nook
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Jeannette

"It was inevitable that someone as dedicated and as talented as Shannon Schur would take"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


NCBA files comments on Clean Water Act

The National Cattlemen's Beef Association filed comments Jan. 19 with the Environmental Protection Agency on the proposed Clean Water Act Section 308 CAFO (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations) Reporting Rule. NCBA Deputy Environmental Counsel Ashley Lyon said the proposed rule reaches beyond the agency's authority and could put the nation's food system at risk of increased terrorist attacks.

"EPA should pull this rule. The agency needs to redirect its focus on working with states and other partners to attain already publicly available information that would allow them to work towards their goal of improved water quality," said Lyon. "This can be done in a way that does not put our food system at increased risk."

According to Lyon, despite numerous meetings where livestock groups and other government agencies raised serious biosecurity and privacy concerns, the agency still proposed the rule. The rule requires all cattle operations meeting the regulatory definition of a CAFO to report a long list of information about their operations to EPA, including latitude and longitude (or street address) of the production area, acres available for land application of manure, type and number of head and contact information of the owner or authorized representative. EPA would place this information on the agency's website in an easily searchable database, where Lyon fears extremists can access the information with the intent to do harm to cattle operations or the nation's food system.

"The livestock industry presented safety concerns to EPA on more than one occasion. Unfortunately, it seems that up to this point those concerns have largely fallen on deaf ears," said Lyon. NCBA's comments also asserted EPA's lack of authority to make this broad request considering a recent court decision that found EPA only has CWA authority over feeding operations that discharge. Lyon said the "blanket request" goes beyond what the court clearly indicated was EPA's regulatory limit. If finalized, any non-compliance with the rule is a violation of the CWA and becomes subject to fines of up to $37,500 per day. The agency will now begin the process of reviewing comments regarding this proposed rule.


Click for related articles Ag secretary blasts KBA board of directors
CICA to host Legislative Day Feb. 14
DOL to re-propose 'parental exemption' of child labor in agriculture rule
High Plains/Midwest Ag Journal now available on e-readers
Legislators honor KARL president
Wheat growers learn about export opportunities in Portland

Comments on Articles article 2012- 6 - 0120NCBABiosecurityConcerns.cfm
Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


68 Recommend | 0 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2012.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ





Cattlemens Beef Board




Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives