Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Subscribe
High Plains Journal on Nook

AgriMartin
Journal Getaways
Reader Comment:
by Eliza Winters

"I think that the new emission standards are a great move. I think that the"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Farm Survey


AFBF: Chesapeake Bay bill good for farms, economy

The Chesapeake Bay Program Reauthorization and Improvement Act (H.R. 4153) would greatly improve the Chesapeake Bay and contribute to the health of local farms, ranches and rural economies--all while staying true to the original intent of the Clean Water Act, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation.

The bill, introduced by Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-VA, reauthorizes the bay program, and it reaffirms that states have sole authority to implement rules related to nutrient loads that might make their way into the bay.

"Protecting the bay is an important goal, but it is also important to have regulatory provisions in place that preserve the role of states in determining their own land-use and water-quality regulations," said AFBF President Bob Stallman. "This bill would do that through a program that is led by the states and supported by the Agriculture Department. And, this legislation provides states the tools they need to balance economic growth and job creation with the desire for a clean and healthy Chesapeake Bay."

According to AFBF, states' rights under the Clean Water Act have come under assault by the Environmental Protection Agency, which has threatened to expand federal control over the Chesapeake Bay region, contrary to the agency's authority under the Clean Water Act.

AFBF said that under the EPA program, the agency "would unlawfully micromanage state actions and the activities of farmers, homeowners and businesses within the six-state watershed, imposing specific pollutant allocations on activities such as farming and homebuilding, sometimes down to the level of individual farms."

"The manner in which the EPA has approached this issue clearly demonstrates that the resulting impact could be enormous for state and local economies," Stallman said. "Such decisions, if necessary, should be made by our elected officials in Congress. But overall, this bill would support the states in achieving clean water for the bay, without trampling their authority in the process."


Click for related articles Crews to inventory state's woody biomass resources
Conference on aging set for April 27
Brownback joins governors standing up for American agriculture
Farmers, ranchers contribute to hunger program
FSA offers new options for beginning farmers, ranchers
Organizations stand strong for Conservation Title
Records 0
Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


134 Recommend | 0 Comments

Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2013.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Search HPJ





Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives