0804WinterCanolaSulfurNeeds.cfm Determine sulfur needs of winter canola
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal



Farm Survey


AgriMartin
Journal Getaways
Reader Comment:
by Wheat_Harvest movie

"Thanks so much for the article! These are the types of people we hope to"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.




Determine sulfur needs of winter canola

Advertisement

Oklahoma

Sulfur is considered the fourth most important plant nutrient. Its deficiency in canola has been reported in Canada and some parts of the United States due to:

--Environmental laws restricting sulfur dioxide emissions from industrial sources;

--The use of more concentrated fertilizers that do not contain sulfur impurities;

--Increases in yields resulting from genetic and technological advances; and

--Decreases in pesticide and fungicides containing sulfur.

Some field studies have shown an increase in crop quality and yield following S fertilization. However, most of these studies were conducted in Canada and northeastern United States where deposition of S in rainfall is considerably lower than other parts of North America. The mineralization of soil S also occurs at a slower rate in the north due to low temperatures affecting the amount of plant-available inorganic sulfur supply. Nevertheless, producers are being encouraged to fertilize with sulfur regardless of soil test results and geographic locations, which may not be economically sound because many soils in our state are able to supply needed S despite the reduced input and increased demand.

A field trial was conducted recently in Perkins and Lahoma to find out if canola responses to S fertilization in Oklahoma. The treatments were designed to determine if two different types of sulfur fertilizers had an effect on yield and seed quality of two different canola cultivars. The two canola cultivars were hybrid HyClass 154W and open pollinated DKW 47-15. The two sulfur fertilizers used were ammonium sulfate and elemental sulfur. There were four rates of each sulfur source: 0, 10, 20, and 30 pounds S per acre. The study was repeated in two growing seasons: 2009-2010 and 2010-2011.

We didn't find significant yield or quality increase due to S fertilization at either location. Since the site at Perkins has a sandy texture, a response to increasing sulfur rates would be more evident and expected; however, due to adequate soil sulfur supply a significant response did not occur. Soils (0 to 18 inch) at both locations had over 60 pounds S per acre, which was adequate for the canola crop. Typically, the amount of S needed is about 1/10 of the nitrogen required. Therefore, a soil test should be taken to decide if S is really needed for your field.



Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Archives Search



Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives