Managingresidue.cfm Managingresidue.cfm Managing residue is critical for corn emergence
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal
Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizer



Farm Survey


AgriMartin
Journal Getaways


Reader Comment:
by Eliza Winters

"I think that the new emission standards are a great move. I think that the"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Managing residue is critical for corn emergence

By Jennifer M. Latzke


RESIDUE MANAGEMENT—Paul Jasa, University of Nebraska Extension engineer reminds producers to manage their corn residue in no-till fields. (Journal photo by Jennifer M. Latzke.)

No-till corn growers know that their crops benefit from the practice. Long-term no-till practices have been shown to improve biological and microbial activity in fields, breaking down crop residue and releasing nutrients back into the soil for future crops.

Research has also shown no-till residue reduces evaporation, saving 3 to 5 inches of water over the whole growing season. This is especially helpful later in the growing season when precipitation is reduced.

However, the same residue that can benefit a crop can also cause emergence stress in cold, wet springs if not properly managed. The issue can be further compounded in no-till continuous corn fields, where there can be a potential for diseases to harbor on last year’s crop residue. Also, depending on how much crop debris is left on the field, and how uniform, it may be more difficult for the soil tempera-ture to warm enough to provide that perfect environment for a corn seedling.

Therefore, the key to making continuous corn-on-corn rotations work in continuous no-till fields is forward-thinking and manage-ment, said Paul Jasa, Extension engineer with the University of Nebraska.

It starts at harvest

Ideally, residue management happens at harvest time, Jasa said. “It’s best to harvest the crop taller, leave some of the corn stalk standing at harvest,” Jasa said.

A 10- to 12-inch-tall corn stalk that’s upright in the field after harvest keeps other residue from blowing in the field, as well as catches snowfall and reduces wind erosion. “If you cut or shred the stalk too short, you risk having wind blow that around in the field, and you’ll get bare patches with no residue as well as drifts of residue buildup that can be dif-ficult to plant into,” Jasa said.

Managing residue is about creating uniformity. Using the cornhead on the combine to process the corn stalks and leaves that do get harvested can make the next spring’s planting go a lot easier. Knife-to-knife or tapered snap-ping rolls are more aggressive to lacerate and crush the stalks, Jasa said. Breaking down the stalks exposes them to microbes and weather to speed up decomposition, he added. With Bt corn hybrids, processing the stalks with the cornhead is even more important, Jasa added.

Other ways to manage no-till would be to use cover crops to add biodi-versity to the corn residue. Cover crops, Jasa said, offer humidity with their canopy, which decomposes the residue from corn harvest, and the cover crops also feed the soil microbes that feed on the corn residue. To use them to their best advantage, though, Jasa said they must be controlled so they don’t dry out the soil or create additional residue.

However, if a producer is planting continuous no-till corn and hasn’t planned ahead for the spring planting at the time of fall harvest, there are still ways to improve the success of the next crop, Jasa said.

At planting

Offset planting has been suggested as one way to utilize today’s precision ag technology in a no-till situation. “Offset planting only works if you had GPS when you planted last year’s crop,” Jasa said. Producers can instead use a low-tech technique of lining the edge of the planting tractor’s tire against last year’s row and planting off of the old row. This means producers aren’t planting between rows, risking driving on residue and tire damage from tough stalks, he added.

Planting 4 or 5 inches off to the side of the old row avoids old root stumps from the last crop, Jasa added. This increases the uniformity of planting depth, too.

“Corn needs 2 inches of depth at planting,” Jasa said. “I prefer up to 3 inches deep if planting into dryland.” A uniform depth at planting allows for a better root system to develop, improved water and nutrient uptake. Also, planting a little deeper gives the seed a uniform temperature during the day and night during the fluctuating spring months, Jasa said.

Jasa also advised farmers to be sure to have enough weight on their planters so that they can properly penetrate the soil to the right planting depth, especially if there is heavy residue in the field. “Remember to set the planting depth slightly deeper as the depth gauge wheels will be riding on some residue,” he said.

Uniformity is key

If a farmer finds himself with a field of patchy residue at planting and would like to improve the uniformity of the residue for the benefit of his new crop, Jasa said there are a few mechanical solutions available.

“They could run a residue mover up front, followed by a spoke closing wheel behind the planter,” Jasa said. Producers should avoid coulters, he advised. While they can cut residue, loosen the soil and reduce wear on seed furrow openers in abrasive soils, they may also cause air pockets in the seed zone if they’re set too deep.

Spoked residue movers, though, can warm poorly drained soils as they part the residue, and can even out thicker layers of residue with more patchy spots in the field. “Floating residue movers with depth bands help keep the surface more uniform, reducing soil movement,” Jasa said.

Only use spoked residue movers, however, in new no-till fields. If used in long-term no-till fields, residue movers can do more harm than good. Residue that’s moved at planting can later blow back over the row and create less uniform emergence.

Consider rotations

With the price of corn, it’s difficult to advise farmers to consider rotating out of continuous corn in their continuous no-till fields, but that’s just what they should do, Jasa said. “Push the pencil,” Jasa said. “This year, with high corn prices, it was different. But, generally corn on corn is not as profitable as a corn-soybean rotation. We’ve shown that you can improve profit by $100 per acre with a corn-soybean rotation over corn-on-corn.”

Switching to a rotation also improves yields. With a corn-soybean rotation, Jasa said there’s been shown a 5 to 20 percent yield increase in irrigated corn, and a 10 to 50 percent yield increase in dryland corn.

“Continuous no-till works best when you use crop rotation and diversity to break down the disease cycle,” Jasa said. “If you change crops, you’ll change the pests. If you choose to do continuous corn, it’s important to properly select your varieties, and look for traits of resistance different from the previous year’s crop.

“It’s best if you have a variety susceptible to one disease that you plant the next year a variety not susceptible to the disease.” For example, grey leaf spot likes to stay on old residue, he said. Jasa emphasized the importance of scouting for disease and weed issues, especially in monocultures.

The benefits of continuous notill are worth the extra effort in planning, Jasa said, even in continuous corn. “The longer you are in continuous no-till, the improved biologic activity that’s present to break down crop residue,” Jasa said. All it takes is a little forward-thinking.

Jennifer M. Latzke can be reached at 620-227-1807, or jlatzke@hpj.com.



Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Archives Search







Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives