0131AngusPremiumStudysr.cfm Angus calves continue to outsell similar non-Angus calves
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal



Farm Survey


AgriMartin
Journal Getaways


Reader Comment:
by Greater Franklin County

"Thanks for picking up the story about our Buy One Product Local campaign --- we're"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Angus calves continue to outsell similar non-Angus calves

Advertisement

High-percentage Angus calves continue to outsell non-Angus calves of similar weight and frame at livestock auctions across the U.S.

Data collected from eight cooperating markets in fall 2010 reveal steers of that breed brought $6.32 per hundredweight more than their non-Angus counterparts.

That's a $32.58-per-head Angus advantage for the average 516-pound steer.

Certified Angus Beef LLC has tracked similar patterns regionally and nationwide since 1999 through its "Here's the Premium" study. Average premiums have trended higher for Angus genetics over the years, with the most recent figure just 47 cents per hundredweight below the 2008 record spread, but on slightly heavier average weights. The Angus heifer premium over non-Angus was 44 cents per hundredweight more than in 2008.

The 2010 comparison study included more than 10,000 head from nearly 600 lots; the overall database contains records on 12,721 lots and approximately 275,000 cattle from 13 states. The markets participate in the study on condition that exact locations remain confidential.

"We've seen the premium grow because cattle feeders have learned from experience that high-percentage Angus cattle are healthier and more profitable to feed than other types, said Steve Suther, the CAB director of industry information who initiated the study. "When they bid accordingly, there are more dollars for Angus cow-calf producers compared to those with other cattle."

The premium has endured independent of commodity cattle market trends.

Kevin Dhuyvetter, an agricultural economist at Kansas State University, has been providing statistical expertise from the start.

"This was the second-highest Angus premium among 10 sets of fall values for steers," Dhuyvetter said. "It was the third-highest Angus premium for heifers."

For the first eight years of the project, fall surveys compared prices for Angus and non-Angus calves weighing 400 pounds to 599 pounds, and spring surveys compared those for 600 pounds to 799-pound feeders. Since 2008, the survey is only conducted every other fall. While the overall average price per head tends to increase for the lighter fall-sold calves, premiums for all Angus-influenced cattle have remained consistent and strong throughout the study.

As the last two HTP installments have shown strong Angus-influenced premiums, the average historical premium for all Angus steers in the database moved up by $2.96 per head from 2008 to average $24.22 in the 2010 report.

All calf prices were consistently $12 to $14 per hundredweight higher at northern and western locations, compared to the base of Oklahoma, but Kentucky calf prices averaged $5.86 per hundredweight lower, Dhuyvetter noted.

Auction markets from states that also include Kansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, California and Nebraska reported breed type, sex, weight, and price of calves personally known as Angus genetics compared to non-Angus calves on four different sale dates. One Dakota market manager said roughly 80 percent of the cattle sold there are high-percentage Angus; providing listings for similar but non-Angus calves is often reported as a challenge across the country.



Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Archives Search



Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives