1122TransgenicCornAdvancess.cfm Advances made in transgenic corn
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal
Commerical Hay Equipment For The Farm
Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizer

Farm Survey

Journal Getaways

Reader Comment:
by Wheat_Harvest movie

"Thanks so much for the article! These are the types of people we hope to"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Advances made in transgenic corn

Advances in transgenic technology and insect resistance management are occurring at a rapid pace. There are now more than 23 Bt transgenic corn products in more than five product lines that are resistant to certain insect pests. The mix of traits, target pests, and resistance management requirements vary by product and can cause confusion. To help farmers keep track of the changes to make the best hybrid selections for their farm, Chris DiFonzo (Michigan State University) and Eileen Cullen (University of Wisconsin-Madison) developed a table that presents a recent update of transgenic traits for corn. There are several items to take note of in the trait table, which can be viewed at http://goldenplains.colostate.edu/agri/agri_docs/2011_transgenic_corn_table.pdf.

--Insect resistance. Six species of caterpillar (European corn borer, western bean cutworm, black cutworm, corn earworm, stalk borer, and fall armyworm) are controlled or suppressed by Bt corn products. Suppressed means that while some of the pest population may be killed by the trait, a significant number will likely survive. If you are expecting a specific pest problem, choose a product that is labeled to control that specific pest, not suppress it. These Bt products target caterpillars, although not all products control the same group of caterpillars. Beetle-specific transgenic products target corn rootworm larvae; some products target both caterpillars and corn rootworm larvae.

--Herbicide tolerance. Herbicide tolerance also varies among products. Some are only glyphosate or Roundup Ready tolerant, some are only Liberty Link/glufosinate tolerant, and some are tolerant to both Liberty Link/glufosinate tolerant and glyphosate or Roundup Ready. A few products only have some hybrids within the product line that are Roundup Ready/glyphosate tolerant, and one is not herbicide tolerant. Every year corn fields are mistakenly sprayed with an herbicide that they are thought to be tolerant of. Be careful with hybrid selection and remember exactly what traits your hybrid has and where you planted it.

--Refuges for resistance management. Insect resistance management requirements are continuing to evolve. Currently, two basic types of refuge are required--structured and non-structured. A structured refuge refers to the 5 percent or 20 percent non-Bt corn plantings farmers are required to plant within, adjacent to, or within 1/2 mile of the Bt corn field. Non-structured refuge refers to the inclusion of a certain percent of non-Bt corn seed in a bag of Bt corn seed (currently 5 to 20 percent). This is often called refuge-in-a-bag (RIB), and takes the responsibility of planting a separate refuge out of the hands of the farmer.

These differences in refuge size and location can be confusing and beg the question "Why"? Differences in refuge requirements are based on the biology, behavior, and genetics of the pest, the pest's relationship to the crop, and the relative toxicity of the toxin or toxins within the plant.

--Refuge size. For example, refuge size depends largely on the probability of resistance developing. The initial transgenic corn hybrids resistant to European corn borer contain one gene that code for the production of one toxin that targets corn borers (e.g., Cry1Ab). This toxin interacts with a specific receptor site in the insect gut. Some of the newer transgenic hybrids contain two genes that code for two different toxins (e.g., Cry1F, Cry1Ab) that interact with two different receptor sites in the insect gut. Either one of these toxins can kill the corn borer. If an insect develops resistance to one of the toxins, it would still likely be susceptible to the other. European corn borers are less likely to develop resistance in corn fields planted with Bt corn that produces two different toxins targeting corn borers than in corn that produces only one corn borer specific toxin. Therefore, the refuge can be smaller for fields planted to corn that produces two toxins targeting corn borers.

--Refuge location. Another example is the difference in refuge proximity to the Bt corn field. For lepidopteran resistant hybrids--those resistant to corn borer larvae--the refuge may be up to 1/2 mile away; however, for coleopteran resistant hybrids--those resistant to corn rootworm larvae--the refuge must be in or adjacent to the Bt corn field. In this case, the mobility of the adult insect is the primary reason for the difference. Before they mate, female corn borer moths fly around more than female corn rootworm beetles, so the refuge can be further away for the corn borer resistant hybrids than for the corn rootworm resistant hybrids.

--Long-term value. Many biological, behavioral, genetic, toxicological, and other factors are examined and weighed before specific insect resistance management requirements are established. As we learn more and as new products are developed, insect resistance management will continue to evolve.

Although it does make corn hybrid selection more complex, resistance management requirements will help reduce the chance of insect resistance developing and help maintain the efficacy of these products into the future.

Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com


Archives Search

NCBA Convention

United Sorghum Checkoff Program

Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives