Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Auction Calendar
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by japri19

"Very good information thanks a lot for sharing."....Read the story...
Join other discussions.



Survey: Consumers support biotechnology

The International Food Information Council 2010 "Consumer Perceptions of Food Technology" survey found that consumers support the use of food biotechnology when they consider its potential benefits for reducing the impact of food and food production on the environment, and for improving sustainability.

Results of the 14th IFIC Food Technology Consumer Survey were released June 2. The survey explores U.S. consumers' perceptions of various aspects of plant and animal biotechnology, as well as sustainability and new and emerging technologies such as nanotechnology. This year, consumers responded most positively to benefits of biotechnology for the environment and sustainability. For example, more than three-quarters (77 percent) of consumers would be likely to purchase foods produced through biotechnology for their ability to reduce pesticide use (consistent from 2008), and 80 percent of consumers said they would be likely to purchase bread, crackers, cookies, cereal, or pasta products containing wheat that was grown using plant biotechnology if they were produced using sustainable practices to feed more people using fewer resources such as land and pesticides (new question in 2010). While products containing wheat grown using biotechnology are still up to a decade away from being commercially available, these data indicate a receptive audience to such products if they are produced through sustainable practices.

"These results suggest that the importance of the impact of food production on the environment is here to stay for consumers," said Marianne Smith Edge, IFIC's interim vice president, Nutrition and Food Safety. "Over the last several years we've seen the overall awareness of sustainability and environmental issues continue to grow."

Half of consumers (50 percent) have heard or read at least "a little" about the concept of sustainability in food production. This is a significant increase from 2008, when about four in ten (41 percent) knew something about the topic. In 2007, only three in ten (30 percent) were aware of the concept.

With the increased focus by Americans on reducing environmental impact, we see that those aspects of sustainable crop production benefiting the environment resonate most with consumers. When asked to rank aspects of sustainable crop production (from a list of options) in order of importance, consumers' top three are:

--"Growing more food on less land so valuable land like rain forests is not destroyed/used as growing space for increased food production." (69 percent)

--"Reducing the amount of pesticides needed to produce food." (65 percent)

--"Plants that use water more efficiently, thereby conserving fresh water to help cope with predicted droughts and water shortages." (62 percent)

In other survey findings, about seven in ten Americans (69 percent) say they have heard or read at least "a little" about biotechnology, steady from previous years. Significantly more consumers believe there are foods produced through biotechnology in the supermarket now (28 percent) compared with 2008 (23 percent), although these consumers are still the minority.

The majority of consumers are somewhat or very likely to purchase a variety of produce, such as tomatoes or potatoes, modified by biotechnology to provide more healthful fats like Omega-3s (76 percent); to avoid trans fat (74 percent); or to make them taste better/fresher (67 percent).

Impressions of Plant Biotechnology: About one-third (32 percent) are somewhat or very favorable toward plant biotechnology, with about two in ten (19 percent) somewhat or very unfavorable and about three in ten (29 percent) neither favorable nor unfavorable.

Impressions of Animal Biotechnology: About three in ten (29 percent) Americans are somewhat or very favorable toward animal biotechnology, while slightly more than one-quarter (27 percent) are somewhat or very unfavorable, and about one-quarter (24 percent) are neither favorable nor unfavorable.

Interestingly, the majority of consumers who are either unfavorable or neutral in their views toward animal biotechnology cited "I don't have enough information" about animal biotechnology (55 percent) and/or "I don't understand the benefits of using biotechnology with animals" (39 percent) as their reason(s) for being unfavorable or neutral.

For more findings from the IFIC 2010 Food Technology Consumer Survey, visit the International Food Information Council Foundation website: www.foodinsight.org/Resources/Detail.aspx?topic=Consumer_Insights_Regarding_Food_Biotechnology.


Click for related articles Montrose County designated primary natural disaster area
Kansas, Midwest rural economies continue to soften
More farmers are tweeting to respond to activists
Branded beef company urges GIPSA caution
Dodge City to host Kansas MarketPlace
Nebraska gets grant to improve rural care

Comments on Articles article 2010- 37 - 0603SurveyShowsConsumersSup.cfm
Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


132 Recommend | 0 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2011.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ






Canola U registration
Harvest Heroes ad




Inside Futures

Editorial Archives