Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Auction Calendar
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Pamela Drew

"Lost in your lament over export obsticles is the basic truth that repeated claims of"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


AFBF backs bipartisan house effort to nullify EPA proposal

The Environmental Protection Agency's proposed scheme to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act is "economically harmful, legally suspect and environmentally indefensible," according to the American Farm Bureau Federation.

AFBF is urging House members to support a bipartisan resolution to disapprove EPA's greenhouse gas proposal, H.J. Res. 76, introduced by Reps. Ike Skelton (D-MO), Jo Ann Emerson (R-MO), and House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (D-MN). The resolution would nullify EPA's proposal, which is built around the agency's flawed finding in December 2009 that greenhouse gases indirectly threaten human health and therefore could be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

The resolution to disapprove EPA's proposal would not weaken any environmental protections, but would simply provide Congress the appropriate opportunity to debate and legislate in this area, according to AFBF.

"U.S. farmers and ranchers will be harmed by higher energy and fertilizer costs if EPA is allowed to move forward with its proposal to regulate GHGs," said AFBF President Bob Stallman. Further, according to AFBF, if EPA is allowed to move forward with its proposal, "it appears likely that for the first time in history, even medium- and small-sized farming operations might have to comply" with expensive permitting requirements.

"Such policy decisions, which will affect the entire U.S. economy for decades to come, should be made by elected officials, not by a regulatory agency," Stallman said. He also encouraged both chambers of Congress to work toward bipartisan consensus on the disapproval matter.

AFBF also strongly supports S.J. Res. 26, a resolution introduced in the Senate by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) to disapprove EPA's regulation of greenhouse gases. The Peterson-Skelton-Emerson resolution introduced in the House is identical to Murkowski's resolution in the Senate, as well as another House resolution, H.J. Res 77, introduced by Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX).


Click for related articles Texas free of drought for first time since 2007
Boswell meets with Iowa farmers, producers
Ag expertise needed to feed, fuel world's skyrocketing demands for food, energy
Triumph of Ag Expo coming to Qwest Center-Omaha March 3 and 4
USDA grant to create Healthy Urban food Enterprise Development Center in Arkansas
Nature tour of Costa Rica offered by Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Comments on Articles article 2010- 11 - 0304AFBFBacksBipartisanReso.cfm
Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


334 Recommend | 0 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2011.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ






Canola U registration
Harvest Heroes ad




Inside Futures

Editorial Archives
<