Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal
Commerical Hay Equipment For The Farm
Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizer



Farm Survey


AgriMartin
Journal Getaways




Reader Comment:
by ohio bo

"An excellent essay on fairs that brought back many memories for me. In my part"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Attorney: Poultry companies turned watershed into mess

TULSA, Okla. (AP)--Motivated by greed, several Arkansas poultry companies cut corners when getting rid of thousands of tons of waste and allowed it to pollute a sensitive watershed, an attorney for the state argued Feb. 18.

But the 11 companies accused of poisoning the Illinois River watershed shared by Oklahoma and Arkansas accused the state of using bad science and flimsy evidence to make its case.

After a trial that lasted four months, attorneys made their closing arguments. U.S. District Judge Gregory K. Frizzell, who heard the trial from the bench, gave no indication when he might rule.

Louis Bullock, an attorney for Oklahoma, said the poultry industry had turned a once-pristine recreational area enjoyed by tens of thousands of visitors each year into a "green, slimy mess.''

"Judge, I'm all in favor of making a buck, but it's never an excuse to destroy the beauty of this country to make a buck,'' he said.

The state says the companies, including industry giants Tyson Foods Inc. and Cargill Inc., for decades disposed of hundreds of thousands of tons of chicken litter each year by giving it to local crop farmers to use as fertilizer. The state says the companies knew the litter--or the feathers, droppings and bedding left in barns after birds are taken to slaughter--was harming the watershed, but that it was cheaper to give it to the farmers than to dispose of it properly.

"They knew better, but they did it anyway,'' Bullock said.

Attorneys for the poultry companies said their clients handled the waste responsibly and lawfully. They said Oklahoma failed to produce evidence that the waste threatens people or the environment, and they instead blamed the pollution in the watershed on 12 wastewater treatment plants and the runoff from cattle waste.

"We've got scattered dots and scattered lines of evidence that are not connected,'' Tyson attorney Mark Hopson said of the science Oklahoma presented to make its case.



Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Archives Search


Advertisement
NCBA Convention

United Sorghum Checkoff Program

Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives