Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

High Plains Journal for Kindle
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Jeannette

"It was inevitable that someone as dedicated and as talented as Shannon Schur would take"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


Study shows ground beef from grain-fed cattle healthier than grass-fed

Grass-fed beef may not have as many healthful traits as some perceive, according to results from a recent Texas AgriLife Research study.

Stephen Smith, Ph.D., an AgriLife Research meat scientist, and a team of researchers have found that contrary to popular perception, ground beef from pasture-fed cattle had no beneficial effects on plasma lipid.

However, high monounsaturated-fat ground beef from grain-fed cattle increased HDL cholesterol, increased LDL particle diameters, and decreased insulin, suggesting that ground beef produced by intensive production practices provides "a healthful, high-quality source of protein."

"We wanted to see from this study if product from pasture-fed and corn-fed cattle had different effects on LDL or HDL cholesterol," Smith said. "We looked at the scientific literature and could not find any justifications for the statement that pasture-fed beef is better for you. All we found were rat studies in which they were fed omega-3 fatty acids, so we wanted to know if this applied to beef from grass-fed cattle."

The study, funded by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, used Angus cattle raised at the McGregor AgriLife Research Center. One group of cattle was fed a pasture diet with supplement hay. The steers were kept on pasture until 20 months of age.

A second group of Angus steers was fed the same way a feedlot operator would and kept on a corn-based diet until 16 months of age, then reaching USDA Choice status.

A third group of Angus steers were fed the corn-based diet the longest, until reaching USDA Prime. The fat in cattle that are high in marbling is low in saturated and trans-fats, and higher in monounsaturated fats.

Beef cuts from the plate and flank taken from all three grades were made into a ground beef product, containing 24-percent fat.

Next, a group of 27 men completed a three-way crossover study. Each group rotated, consuming five 114-gram ground beef patties per week for six weeks from each of the three sets of cattle used in the study.

"There really were no negative effects of feeding ground beef from the pasture-fed cattle," Smith said. "We did see many positive effects in men that consumed ground beef from corn-fed cattle. The ground beef from the USDA Prime cattle increased HDL cholesterol and LDL particle diameter. Both effects are protective against cardiovascular disease. The Prime ground beef also decreased insulin, so it may have some protective effect against type II diabetes."

Smith said the study results surprised many. "As we talked to some user groups and told them that we had found pasture-fed beef is higher in saturated trans-fat, they were shocked."

Smith presented the findings to the National Cattlemen's Beef Association last year and is now sharing among consumers and producers. He recently gave a presentation at the Texas Human Nutrition Conference in College Station. Smith said he did receive some initial negative feedback from ranchers in the grass-fed beef business, but he isn't telling them that what they are doing is wrong.

"I know that cattle are adapted to growing on high-roughage, pasture diets, but my focus is the beef product," he said. "A lot of producers are receptive. What I'm trying to show them is that the longer cattle are fed a corn or grain-based diet, the healthier the product will be."

"I realize cost is involved--feeding corn is expensive. But, if you want a healthier product, you need more marbling. Time on feed is a big factor."

The study team included Rosemary Walzem, Ph.D., AgriLife Research poultry scientist, and Stephen Crouse, Ph.D., researcher from Texas A&M University's health and kinesiology department.


Click for related articles Dairy judging camp July 11 to 12 will focus on life skills
Kansas Cattlemen's Association rejects NCBA task force proposal
KCA expresses concerns about USDA traceability system
K-State professor working on animal health partnership with China
Nebraskans graduate from NCTA Cow/Calf College
Buying feed, culling during drought

Comments on Articles article 2010- 24 - 0527StudyShowsGrassfedBeefL.cfm
Reader Comments
Caveman — 07/15/2010 09:07:45
I agree with Rancher.. The statement that corn is more expensive than grass feeding gives you one indication of why these results are tilted in favor of grain feeding. Hay is cheaper than corn... BUT pasture land for grazing is more expensive than a feeding lot for grain fed. Hay loses it's "grass" benefit only days after it has been cut. The phyto enzymes begin dying within hours and with each subsequent day of drying, it becomes little more nutritionally valuable than straw. Pasture raised and finished beef not only has higher omega 3 to 6 ratio, it also has substantially lower bacterial infection rates and higher protein to protein conversion in the body. Just say it.. Grain fed is easier to produce, cheaper to produce and easier to sell because fat tastes good. But please don't insult our intelligence and try to tell us it's healthier... But I guess you have to keep the guys happy who are paying the bills.

Reader Comments
Rancher — 06/18/2010 10:06:57
I have always liked the High Plains Journal, which is why publishing this article disappoints me. This study is very biased from beginning to end. There is no result from the study that can be validated or trusted. Unfortunately, Dr. Smith starts with a lie that he could not find any studies except rat studies on Omega 3's. Secondly he uses "grassfed" cattle from an unvarified source and not a grassfed producer. His supposed "grassfed" product had 27% fat in the ground beef ... what? He took 27 subjects and gave them 5 ozs of beef for 5 days a week with no control over the rest of their diet or excercise. This study is a classic example of monetary science. Science that has been bought a paid for the desired results. Shame on you Dr. Smith

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


220 Recommend | 2 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2011.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ





Cattlemens Beef Board

Canola U registration
Harvest Heroes ad




Inside Futures

Editorial Archives