Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

High Plains Journal on Nook
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by nythoroughbred

"Mr. Loos' not-quite-revisionist history lesson proves one thing ... he's all hat no horse."....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


Animal rights versus animal welfare

The art of politics is changing the debate to allow your side to win. In the escalating activism against raising livestock in confinement, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) has taken the moral high ground, and livestock producers are now having to fight from an inferior position against a well-funded and politically savvy opponent.

An Ohio agricultural journalist defined HSUS this way: "It is a radical activist organization dedicated to reducing and replacing animal-derived proteins and products from the human lifestyle. Equating animals with humans, they passionately believe that domesticated pets and livestock should have the same rights as every American citizen, and firmly hold that no animal should be consumed for food."

HSUS defines itself as: "Working to reduce the suffering of animals raised for meat, milk and eggs."

The difference is striking in the perception of animals by those who choose to raise them and those who choose to defend them. Why hasn't this animal rights movement caught on in the past? It is because in the post-agrarian era of our society, most people have never seen their food when it was alive, so they are easily convinced that the life of the animal was miserable and the master was cruel. In generations past, even though the animal rights activists were vocal, the public had enough of a link to farming that they understood its purpose and trusted its producers.

It is clear that HSUS and People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) are in the right place at the right time. At its core, this is a cause that may be equated to abortion. The perfect storm is the collision with the interests of large corporate entities that sell food and recreation to the American public. Livestock farmers shouldn't feel alone, as HSUS is also confronting circuses and racetracks about their display and handling of animals. HSUS has stated that a horse is a companion animal. They are opposed to horse slaughter, no matter how humane the method of doing so. Their efforts in Congress have eliminated the utilization of horse meat and byproducts by traditional means.

In Iowa, Harrah's Entertainment--the largest casino operator--is lobbying the legislature to allow them to end dog racing. They are offering $10 million a year for seven years to the state to do so. Harrah's claims dog racing is not bringing in people to watch the races, but an Iowa Department of Agriculture official believes the reason is that they don't want to be picketed by PETA. A study released last year disclosed 101 greyhounds had been injured at Iowa tracks in 2008, including 10 dogs that were euthanized. Enough documentation of broken legs, muscle tears, and severed tails could give the animal rights activists enough clout to hurt the casino's profits.

HSUS proudly announced that it is a shareholder of Domino's Pizza. Put retail fast food chains on the defensive, and the future of the livestock industry may be bleak. It doesn't require elimination of the right to produce livestock for HSUS and PETA to win--it only requires the elimination of profit in livestock production to accomplish their purposes.

At least animal agriculture can now focus on a common threat and identify its adversary in this political and social battle. The greatest liability of HSUS may be its high profile. Those who examine its fundraising say the non-profit organization exploits its similarity in name to local humane societies, though it puts very little of its money toward animal care facilities or adoption. HSUS assets are reported to be $113 million.

A recent manifesto by HSUS calls for a "czar for animal protection." If accomplished, this would cause higher-profile examination of animal care from the chicken house to the White House. Any intersection of animals with people could be targeted, from zoos to puppy producers.

The greatest fear of livestock organizations is that HSUS ultimately seeks a vegan diet for all Americans. This means that whatever victory is attained in animal welfare is not the final goal--only the abolition of meat consumption will fulfill the agenda. If farming interests dismiss animal activism as a "fad" in the cities, they will surrender the cause to those who already have momentum on their side.

For want of a champion, the horse was lost. Thanks to HSUS, it is now relegated to companion animal status unless its owners pay for euthanization and disposal. For want of a champion, California was lost. A proposition sponsored by HSUS would end confinement raising of pork and poultry in the state.

Consider what could happen if the fast food industry downplays the sale of meat. McDonalds could make a major push to market veggie burgers and get a lot of people to try them. The soybean folks have told us for 30 years that they could replace animal protein in our diet with a taste and texture that is satisfying and healthy.

In this society, and under our form of government, there is no secure perch for any occupation or industry. Agriculture has done such a good job of feeding our populace that its producers have become invisible to the consuming public. Activist causes can lay low for generations and then ignite. When they do, the change they bring can be dramatic and irreversible.

Editor's Note: Ken Root is an independent agricultural journalist. He was named the 2009 Farm Broadcaster of the Year and was the 2008 winner of the Oscar in Agriculture. He is an Oklahoma native and graduated from Oklahoma State University with a degree in Agriculture Education. Ken taught vocational agriculture at Union City, Okla., before taking his first broadcasting job with WKY Radio and Television. He worked in Oklahoma, Kansas and Missouri as an agricultural broadcaster and began writing for the High Plains Journal eight years ago.¬ He has spent the last five years as Lead Farm Broadcaster at WHO Radio in¬ Des Moines, Iowa. Ken has also been the executive director of the National AgriChemical Retailers Association in Washington, D.C. and the National Association of Farm Broadcasting in Kansas City, Mo. He and his wife Gail have two adult children and two grandchildren.


1
Click for related articles Education in peril
Simplicity
The future of China
A Brave New World--Trainees wanted

Comments on Articles article 2010- 7 - 0202RootzoneMRFEB8.cfm
Reader Comments
brianmc — 12/05/2010 01:12:15
I am perfectly happy eating hamburgers and not worrying about what the life of the cow was like.

http://www.newyorkcitymerchantservices.com

Reader Comments
www.merchantcashfinder.com — 10/28/2010 01:10:02
Most people are quick to adapt alternative energies and replace oil because of the negative effects. I think we should take more care in how we eat and where we get our food.

This was a great read, not too long yet informative.

Reader Comments
Ed — 03/17/2010 05:03:31
I don't know whether to laugh or cry when I see a supposedly reputable source say something like this: "Equating animals with humans, they [the HSUS] passionately believe that domesticated pets and livestock should have the same rights as every American citizen."

Utter nonsense! Surely you are not suggesting they demand voting rights for animals? Or the right to an education? PLEASE get your information straight.

As for factory farms, as the grandson of a famer and the cousin of the manager of a pig farm I can attest that the modern so-called "factory farm" is an abomination, brutal, environmentally destructive, and unhealthy for humans in so many ways. My grandpa was no sentimentalist. For him an animal had to earn its keep, and that meant be used as food. But he would have been disgusted by modern industrial farming practices.

Thank god for the many dedicated organic, humane farmers, whose feed their animals as nature intended, and have room to move freely. I know the HSUS supports humane farming standards, so they can't be all bad, can they?

Reader Comments
Will — 02/11/2010 08:02:45
GA's comments are most disturbing to this fellow producer. As someone who regularly sees many of these "Factory Farms", I'm always impressed with the level of dedication to Best Management Practices for that specific enterprise. Pound for Pound, they out produce many "Family Farmers" because they invest in these practices. Do you use Nitrogen Sensing technology or even soil test?

Skippy's comments are the same for outlawing the sale of corn to the ethanol industry based upon human needs. He invested thousands in training and it is Skippy's control of how much he used of that. The market is efficient and offers its best price. Killer buyers didn't pay $2500 then and they wouldn't now. We have horse dumping in my part of the world now, and unfortunately they have more feed in the ditches they are found in than where they came from by the looks of those animals. How fair is that to the horse???

Reader Comments
Jason — 02/10/2010 04:02:03
Trouble is HUS's policies result in more paperwork and trouble for all farmers but the small farmers have a harder time surviving. So the end result is more large farms since they can afford to hire lawyers, water experts, full-time vets, you name it. And watch out for hidden bombs in anything HSUS introduces. They're leglislation, inititives are so badly written that even free range get kicked out of business. Prop 2 in CA is written so that even those with a very small flock of chickens won't be able to comply. End result? More bakers and cooks in CA will shift to egg substitutes.

Reader Comments
GA — 02/09/2010 08:02:16
I'll make this brief and simple.

Factory farms don't care about the land, the animals or your health. They only care about money and put real family farms out of business.

I am a farmer. I only have as many animals and land as I can handle. I don't need or want to make milllions this year. My animals aren't packed into cages or tight quarters. They roam on the land and eat grass like they always have.

Only those who don't care about the animals or land are against the HSUS. My community supports me.

Eat local, shop local. Support your local farmer who cares.

I don't fear the HSUS and I thank Yellow Tail.

Reader Comments
skippy — 02/06/2010 02:02:09
I also oppose horse slaughter but am not in the animal rights movement. When slaughter for human consumption went on no one could hold onto there horses. If you put a ad in the paper to sell the kill buyers would show up, they would lie about what they were going to do with your horse. When you have a 18 year old gelding with $25,000 in training I think humans should have the right to say where that animal goes. When slaughter for human consumption went on there was a two year waiting line and a $2,500 price tag for kid horses. So you see when horse slaughter was here we lost control of the industry. Some things are worthe more then money. Safe horses for our children is one of those things.

Reader Comments
calico — 02/06/2010 06:02:01
While the a article is thought provoking, I don't agree with some of the author's assumptions. Not all farmers want to see zero standards for animal care. The problem is the farmers who want to do it right are being undercut in the marketplace by those doing the (unhealthy, unsanitary, unethical) shortcuts. If some minimum standards were put in place, the only people it might hurt are those taking the bad shortcuts -- it would level the playing field. Imagine a world where nobody ships downers or horribly sick animals intentionally to processing. Imagine a world where human antibiotics all still worked well because they weren't overused for "therapeutic" use on whole herds/flocks to increase weight gin.

Farming isn't getting a bad rap with the people because people are disconnected or unwaware. It's getting a bad rap because people ARE becoming aware, and they're disturbed by the rare-but-legal horrible things they're seeing. We need to stand together for better humane, heath, and welfare guidelines for all livestock animals.

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


401 Recommend | 9 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2012.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ









Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives