Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

High Plains Journal on Nook
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Jeannette

"It was inevitable that someone as dedicated and as talented as Shannon Schur would take"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.



Cellulosic ethanol: Expanding options, identifying obstacles


CELLULOSIC ETHANOL—Microbiologist Ken Bischoff, who developed the shake-flask model for simulating bacterial infection during ethanol fermentation, places flasks in an incubator. (Photo by Stephen Ausmus.)

Agricultural Research Service scientists are figuring out how to turn wheat straw into ethanol "gold," and learning more about the bacteria that can "infect" ethanol plants and interfere with fuel production.

At the ARS National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research in Peoria, Ill., ARS chemist Badal Saha conducted a five-year study that examined whether wheat straw--a crop residue left over after the grain has been harvested--could have commercial potential for cellulosic ethanol production.

Saha found he could access and ferment almost all the plant sugars in the biofeedstock when it was pretreated with alkaline peroxide and then broken down by enzymes. This process released even hard-to-reach sugars in plant cell walls, which significantly boosted the overall ethanol output to around 93 gallons per ton of wheat straw.

But the same environments that facilitate fermentation can also nurture microorganisms that "infect" ethanol production facilities and disrupt output. ARS geneticist Tim Leathers collected bacteria from samples at commercial ethanol facilities, including a wet-mill facility that had never been dosed with antibiotics and a dry-grind facility that periodically dosed with antibiotics after bacterial outbreaks. He found that most of the bacterial isolates he collected from both facilities were different types of lactic acid bacteria.

Meanwhile, ARS microbiologist Ken Bischoff developed a model for simulating bacterial contamination and infection. He found that when test cultures were inoculated with Lactobacillus fermentum--one of the most common sources of bacterial infections in ethanol plants--ethanol yields decreased by 27 percent. Sometimes the "infection" could be cured with antibiotics, but he also found one bacterial strain that was already resistant to treatment.

Read more about this research in the April 2010 issue of Agricultural Research magazine, available online at www.ars.usda.gov/is/AR/archive/apr10/ethanol0410.htm.


Click for related articles Finding successful yet cost-effective approaches to controlling nematodes
Arkansas crop conditions: Wheat fair, ryegrass strong
Two NMSU weed scientists selected as Western Society of Weed Science fellows
OSU Winter Canola Field Day set for April 22
Options for springtime pond weed management
Kansas counties working to include agriculture in emergency plans

Comments on Articles article 2010- 17 - 0409ARSRStudiesCellulosicEt.cfm
Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


182 Recommend | 0 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2012.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ









Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives