0914NEagforum09ldMR.cfm Stop being nice, animal ag activist says
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Subscribe


AgriMartin
Journal Getaways
Reader Comment:
by ohio bo

"An excellent essay on fairs that brought back many memories for me. In my part"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Farm Survey


Stop being nice, animal ag activist says

A leading lobbyist thinks farmers and ranchers are "too nice" to those who oppose them and that more needs to be done to fight their influence.

"Our voice in Washington is shrinking and the unfortunate thing is we can't do a damn thing about it," said Steve Kopperud, senior vice president of Policy Directions, Inc., a Washington, D.C.-based lobbying firm specializing in agriculture issues.

Kopperud, who for 18 years served as executive vice president of the American Feed Industry Association and is the founder of the Animal Agriculture Alliance, spoke at the recent Nebraska Governor's Ag Conference at Kearney.

"The problem we face is that of all critical industries we have, agriculture is being told to go backwards," Kopperud said. "Why is agriculture not being praised for embracing safe and modern technology for feeding not only this country but most of the known planet?"

The reality of U.S. and world food production is that two-thirds of North America cannot support crop production, Kopperud said, meaning a switch to a vegetable-based diet, as animal activists insist on, cannot be physically done.

"This is why we have animal agriculture. It is the single most efficient protein conversion unit we can come up with. That does not absolve us from professional, top-notch production practices."

Kopperud then described the opposition to those practices producers face from groups like the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Consumers Union, the Center For Food Safety and the Union of Concerned Scientists.

"These groups demand the abandonment of technology that keeps you profitable and on the farm. It is the loss of production equipment, loss of antibiotics to keep animals healthy, to biotechnology, to you name it, they believe that these things will tip the planet on its axis," Kopperud said.

Talk to everyone

Producers are weak against these groups, he said, because they are not talking to consumers, processors or retailers.

"We have lost relationships that in previous decades kept us all together and moving forward. We now have wedges and chasms between all parts of the food chain. That has to be addressed.

"What happens if we don't address them? We have to know that Nebraska is one of nine states that is not in serious meltdown. If we lose this battle, the success story ends."

Kopperud credited producers as part of an entire food chain in Nebraska driving the rest of the state's economic machine that is Nebraska, which is why returning livestock production to 1930s technology is a mistake.

"It is bizarre. What is ironic is that the groups I've listed and scads of others are the ones who have denounced consolidation in the agriculture sector," Kopperud said. "What they want is that consumers should only purchase from small producers, local producers meaning from under 100 miles of where you live. These people are called locovarians. It should also be natural and organic. I can guarantee you that if we switch to this system it will be hellaciously expensive."

Kopperud targeted much of his remarks against HSUS for its work toward initiating a U.S. horse slaughter ban and PETA for its work in developing tactics against food retailers and restaurant chains.

"The unintended consequences of this national campaign to ban horse slaughter waged by HSUS is that we now have over 110,000 neglected and abandoned horses in this country. There has not been one word from any activist organization as to how we will care for these animals," Kopperud said.

"HSUS, with their leader Wayne Pacelle, is a very savvy organization. They go up on the Hill and say, 'We're not like PETA. We're a dog and cat spay and adoption group. We advocate animal adoption, so don't listen to the crazies, we're the moderates. When you cut away the rhetoric, the agenda of HSUS is similar to that of PETA. There's an old axiom in the animal welfare industry. If you cannot regulate producers out of business, you can cost them out of business, make it so expensive to do business that they'll have to get out."

Kopperud blasted the Quizno's sandwich shop chain for its recent move to sell products from crate-free pork and free-range eggs as part of a green initiative, saying the firm caved in to pressure from PETA on these issues.

"You want to explain to Quizno's that free-roaming animals dump everywhere," Kopperud said. "You can't control it and it's an environmental hazard. How green is that? I bet what happened is that PETA walked into their offices and threatened them with pickets, negative ads and boycotts.

"McDonalds at least has grown up and takes action according to science, but that the world's largest fast food chain even responds to some of these idiots drives me nuts."

Stand with, in front

Kopperud said producers and their groups need to stand with those being attacked by activists.

"It should be the automatic response of any restaurant chain that gets a contact from these people to call the Farm Bureau or Cattlemen or Pork Producers. We have a moral obligation to stand with them and, in a sense, to stand in front of them," Kopperud said. "Nobody can battle activists like the men and women in this room. You do for a living every day what is being attacked."

But, he also said producer groups should abandon current practices of using celebrity endorsers for food products.

"When you do the polling, nobody comes out looking better than farmers and ranchers for production practices as well as quality and safety. Yet, we hire celebrities to sell product and spent not one lousy dime to put your face on the product and the process," Kopperud said. "The public wants to know their food doesn't come from some faceless, nameless factory."

Kopperud calls this a battle for hearts and minds.

"If you wish to stay in business, you need to get off your butt and start talking to consumers, politicians and the media. This is not about educating anyone," Kopperud said. "What they want and deserve is assurance that the people who produce food in this country are responsible and professional.

"They deserve that assurance and we're not giving it to them. When we are attacked, we normally call the PR agencies and ad agencies and make these yahoos go away."

It's understandable for food companies and restaurants to behave this way, because all they have is their brand. Producers need to work harder, he said.

"The only people they hear from is the other side. They see documentaries like Death on the Farm and Food, Inc. and wonder what's happening here with their food."

In the end, Kopperud said, producers need to put a face on the food on people's plates.

"We have to fight back. When Pacelle opens his mouth, you have to fight back," Kopperud said.

"I'm only good at scaring the crap out of you. You are good at telling your story. Tell it."

Larry Dreiling can be reached by phone at 785-628-1117, or by e-mail at ldreiling@aol.com.


Click for related articles TCFA names winners in Junior Fed Beef Challenge
Vaccination programs important for horse health
USDA announces implementation of Livestock Disaster Assistance Programs
July pace remains sluggish for U.S. pork, beef exports
WDGS may be high-quality, low-cost livestock feed
ISU study takes broad scope to study stover harvest effects on yield, soil, climate
Records 7
Reader Comments
cocker — 09/29/2009 03:09:40
wow!!!!!!!!! wonder how much it cost to export a horse to mexico for meat processing???seems a bit naive to think this could be profitable.

anyway people will eat meat until death whether we like it or not! The simple question here is does the constitution apply to animals???????

NO!!! so all you humaniacs should admit being cults and start your own veggie colonies!

Reader Comments
vicki — 09/28/2009 04:09:16
Realitycheck, it’s nice to see you are still around…. Yes, let’s look at facts. Fact: there is no ban on horse slaughter. Anyone wishing to send their horse to slaughter can still do so. Same auctions. Same KBs. Fact: The rescues are busting at the seams because of two reasons. The foremost is the economy. The second is because of irresponsible breeders that keep breeding for a demand that doesn’t exist. Fact: You are correct. A humane death is the responsible thing to do. That is not horse slaughter. There is nothing humane about slaughter from the moment the horses enter the pipeline until they are butchered alive.

The largest lobby in Congress is not HSUS – it is the beef industry. They have successfully paid off legislators for years to keep the bills from going to the floor for a vote and lobby against horses more than any other organization. Take a look at PAC for Larry Craig, et al and see who donated and look at the other anti-horse legislators and look at the donations. Take a look at the pro-horse legislators. You’ll not see a dime from HSUS. Yeah, great article and on the mark as a fictional piece. Of course, no mention of owner responsibility. It’s always everyone else’s fault.

Reader Comments
BADKarma — 09/28/2009 03:09:39
PETA slaughters 97% of the adoptable companion animals brought into their one "shelter" in Virginia every single year. They slaughter 100% of the orphaned squirrels, raccoons, opossums, birds, etc.

Yet, they claim to be "animal rights" activists. They use junk science, doctored footage, lies, terrorism, and knee-jerk emotional blackmail to get their way, and what they, as all Vegan Jihadists REALLY want, is total, cradle-to-grave control of all aspects of human existence. Oh, and world starvation, of course. Because as much as they hate animals, they hate people more.

It's time for farmers to stop being polite. Nauseating as it may be, you have to lower yourself to their level to some degree, and start playing by their rules, because the average Yuppie Liberal Lobotomy Subject truly IS too stupid to understand basic cause-and-effect, much less the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Reader Comments
TerryW — 09/27/2009 09:09:59
Hey Realitycheck - check the ECONOMY, that's why horse rescues are taking in so many horses, people have lost their jobs. Those people that lost their jobs that can't afford to feed and board their horses anymore are not the people that would even consider selling their horses to slaughter. Instead promoting horse slaughter - send a damn donation to a horse rescue - who by the way are paying lots of money, and I mean lots, to vets - who wouldn't be making as much money if those horses were slaughtered. Humane slaughter? There's an oxymoron if I ever heard one. US horse slaughter was no more humane than Mexico's or Canada's is. Check USDA's own investigations. Photos don't lie, but people sure do. Horses are not food animals, they aren't raised as food animals, which is why the EU is finally cracking down on US horsemeat - 6 month holding now starting this April. Illegal drug residues - hazardous to human health.

Reader Comments
realitycheck — 09/27/2009 09:09:19
Wow, this article must have been right on to have activated the animal rights crowd so fast. Good article with valid information. Animal rights groups such as HSUS are destroying agriculture with lies and emotional misinformation. The agriculture community needs to stand up and fight back. You are the ones who know how to raise animals, and you know that a mistreated animal won't produce well. You need to let the public know that also. The nuts that say the horse slaughter ban has not cause pain and suffering for the horses that would otherwise go to humane slaughter are flat out lying. Just look at the facts, look at horse rescues that are busting at the seams, look at the horses being abandoned because there is no other place for them to go. A humane death for a horse is far better than being hauled across the border to Mexico, but the humaniacs won't allow that. The legislators were warned this would happen. It has, but they still deny it. The emperor has no clothes but they have the public and legislators convinced otherwise. Don't let them get away with it and destroy your way of life. Stand up and fight back. If you don't do it now, you won't have another chance. Good article and right on the mark!

Reader Comments
TerryW — 09/26/2009 09:09:25
Exactly Valerie, how can anyone be expected to believe anything this man says when he spouts off something like that? Typical lobbyist talk. The reality is more US horses are being slaughtered now than when we had 3 operating slaughterhouses in the US. And horses are not an "agriculture issue" as the vast majority of horses are kept for pleasure, like dogs and cats. Horses are a "horse industry issue" and we horse owners are real tired of Big Ag sticking their Big Noses into our horse business.

And Big Ag would not have such a problem with groups such as HSUS and Peta if you treated our food animals with compassion, humaneness, and respect. You treat these animals as if they're already meat on a plate, the same way you treat slaughter horses. Americans expect their food to be raised kindly, not kicked around like footballs, abused, butchered while still alive, etc, etc.

You only have yourselves to blame. Clean up your act.

Reader Comments
Valerie James-Patton — 09/26/2009 02:09:11
Kopperud's claim that a national campaign to ban horse slaughter has resulted in 110,000 neglected and abandoned horses is far from the truth. A national ban against horse slaughter has not been passed. 134,000 US horses were exported to slaughter last year, and over 67,000 US horses have been exported to slaughter so far this year. Slaughter remains as available to US horse owners as driving to the nearest local auction. There are no 110,000 neglected and abandoned horses in the US, and if there were, it's certainly not because a national ban on horse slaughter has been passed.

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


788 Recommend | 8 Comments

Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2013.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Search HPJ





Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives

<