Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Subscribe
High Plains Journal on Nook

AgriMartin
Journal Getaways
Reader Comment:
by Greater Franklin County

"Thanks for picking up the story about our Buy One Product Local campaign --- we're"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Farm Survey


New Mexico man pleads guilty in wolf death

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP)--A southern New Mexico man pleaded guilty Aug. 26 to a charge stemming from the death of a Mexican gray wolf that had been released into the wild as part of a reintroduction program.

Alan Van Hout, 52, appeared in federal court in Albuquerque to enter his plea to a misdemeanor charge of unlawfully possessing a Mexican gray wolf, an animal protected by the federal Endangered Species Act.

The U.S. attorney's office said Van Hout shot and killed the wolf on Aug. 6, 2008, and tried to hide the carcass from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the lead agency in the wolf reintroduction effort.

Norm Cairns, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office, said Van Hout wasn't charged with shooting the wolf because he claimed he didn't know it was a Mexican gray wolf when he shot it.

Wolves that are released as part of the program are fitted with tracking devices. Cairns said the wolf that was shot by Van Hout had a tracking device.

As part of a plea agreement, Van Hout faces up to six months in jail and he must forfeit any interest in the rifle that he used to kill the wolf. A sentencing hearing has not yet been scheduled.

There was no telephone listing for Van Hout in New Mexico.

The Mexican wolf, a subspecies of the gray wolf, was exterminated in the wild in the Southwest by the 1930s. In 1998, the government began reintroducing wolves along the Arizona-New Mexico line in a 4 million acre-plus territory interspersed with forests, private land and towns.

There are now about 50 wolves in the wild, but that's half of what biologists had hoped to have by now.

The program has been hampered by illegal shootings, complaints from ranchers who have lost cattle to the wolves and removal of wolves that have violated the program's three-strikes rule. Federal agents can kill or trap and remove any wolf that has been involved in three livestock kills within a year.

Earlier this year, Fish and Wildlife Southwest regional director Benjamin Tuggle said the program's numbers would have been higher had it not been for the illegal shooting of five wolves and the "suspicious demise'' of two others in 2008. He called the illegal taking of wolves a "big concern'' for the agency.

Tuggle, in a news release issued late Aug. 26, said Van Hout's prosecution was important and that the agency's law enforcement officers would continue to "aggressively investigate all illegal activities that impact our efforts to restore a healthy population of Mexican wolves in the wild.''


Click for related articles Kellogg to take reins of Extension educational efforts to dairy industry
Beef, forage featured at field day, Sept. 22, on MU Thompson Farm
Bovine TB creates hassles, few losses for ranchers
Loveland natural beef company expands
Grizzly kills 13 sheep on grazing allotment
Indian group uses modern tools to raise animals
Records 3
Reader Comments
bjbussell — 07/07/2010 05:07:41
Thank you for the example you made of the man who shot the Mexican Gray Wolf. I wish Montana and Idaho would take your example and protect the wolves in their states.

Reader Comments
bjbussell — 07/07/2010 05:07:57
Thank you New Mexico for punishing this man for shooting a Mexican Gray Wolf. Keep up the good work. I wished that Idaho and Montana would take your example about the shooting of Wolves.

Reader Comments
Laura — 09/12/2009 02:09:50
Alan Van Hout was at home one evening way out of the releas area for these wolves. FWS had never contacted him to let him know the wolves were on his neighbors trying to kill livestock just over the hill. Meanwhile FWS were right there chasing the wolves and they managed to chase them into this mans calves. When he saw in the dim evening, a couple animals hemming up his calves trying to get one he assumed they were feral dogs and shot one. The killing was legal under FWS rules. His mistake was panicking and burying the evidence. The next morning FWS showed up with monitors and got a search warrant to find the wolf since they still had telemetry. Point, when the agency won't follow their own policies and inform the communities when wolves are in the area harrassing livestock don't they deserve what they get? This man didn't do anything wrong, except not call them and tell them to get their dirty livestock killing wolf carcass off his deeded land.

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


650 Recommend | 3 Comments

Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2013.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Search HPJ





Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives