Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal


AgriMartin

High Plains Journal online store


2008 Farm Publication Editorial Poll

Place HPJ classified ad

Reader Comment:
by realitycheck
"Wow this article must have been right on to have activated the animal rights crowd"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Poultry industry argues Oklahoma could have done more

TULSA, Okla. (AP)--The Arkansas poultry industry tried Oct. 5 to show that Oklahoma had the power to fix the pollution problem in the Illinois River watershed without hauling poultry processors into federal court but failed to do so.

The 11 companies Oklahoma is suing used the cross-examination of Ed Fite, the director of Oklahoma's Scenic Rivers Commission, to illustrate what the state could have done before the 2005 lawsuit was filed. Oklahoma's lawsuit claims runoff from fields spread with tons of chicken litter has polluted the river valley on the Oklahoma-Arkansas border.

Last week, Fite testified he was in talks with the industry for more than a decade about ways to move chicken waste out of the watershed, but the industry failed to change its practices.

On Oct. 5, poultry industry attorney Tom Green asked Fite why Oklahoma has not banned farmers from letting their cattle defecate in the valley's rivers and streams, restricted cattle from grazing in riparian areas or regulated the use of commercial fertilizer, which contains the same phosphorus that poultry litter does.

Green asked Fite whether it was "humanly possible'' for Oklahoma to implement any of the restrictions.

"The Oklahoma Scenic Rivers Commission has done what we could,'' Fite responded.

Fite's cross-examination came on the third day of testimony in the closely watched case, which could drag on for months.

Its outcome is being monitored by other states thinking about challenging the way the industry does business in other watersheds.

For decades, farmers in northeastern Oklahoma have spread litter from their chicken houses on their fields as a cheap fertilizer to grow other crops. The state argues runoff from the fields contains harmful bacteria that threatens the health of the tens of thousands of people who raft and fish in the watershed each year.

The defendants named in the lawsuit are Tyson Foods Inc., Cargill Inc., Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., Tyson Poultry Inc., Tyson Chicken Inc., Cobb-Vantress Inc., Cargill Turkey Production L.L.C., George's Inc., George's Farms Inc., Peterson Farms Inc. and Simmons Foods Inc.

Testimony is scheduled to continue Oct. 6.


Advertisement
Click for related articles Canadian Cattlemen applaud request for WTO panel against mCOOL
Oklahoma, Kansas to conduct bi-state stop animal movement exercise
SDSGA on the move; group brings issues, concerns to national leaders
Cattleman's Days scheduled in four locations
UNL spreadsheet helps plan winter supplementation
Brucellosis vaccine, diagnostics research progressing at UW

Comments on Articles article 2009- 44 - 1008OKpoultryindustryargues.cfm

Article: Poultry industry argues Oklahoma could have done more

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.

27 Recommend | 0 Comments


Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2009.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com



Market Snapshot

Inside Futures
Editorial Archives

Browse Archives

< 12
61105