Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Auction Calendar
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Pamela Drew

"Lost in your lament over export obsticles is the basic truth that repeated claims of"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


Farmers may want to think twice before selling corn stover

Nebraska

While there have been some offers from a couple of energy companies to buy corn stover this year, Nebraska farmers need to take into account the soil structure loss and nutrient loss before making that decision, University of Nebraska-Lincoln experts say.

Corn stover, or the residue left behind after harvesting corn, can be made into pellets and sold to coal burning power plants generating electricity, said Paul Jasa, UNL Extension engineer.

These companies are offering $15 a ton for short-term contracts and up to $20 a ton for longer-term contracts, typically for 3 tons per acre, Jasa said.

While at first glance this may sound like a lot of money, what is lost in the value of that residue far exceeds what is being offered, Jasa said.

"Our consensus is that they are not offering enough money to give up that corn residue," Jasa said. "The lost nutrients alone aren't even covered by the price, let alone the loss in soil structure."

Corn residue left on the field after harvest contains valuable nutrients that fertilize next year's crop.

The nutrient value of corn residue can range from $17 a ton to $46 a ton. This price range all depends on current fertilizer prices and the differences in nutrient content of the removed residue. The sooner the residue is removed after grain harvest; the more nutrients are removed, Jasa said.

Assuming a residue harvest of 3 tons per acre, on an irrigated corn field, this results in a range of $53.79 to $138.51 per acre extra in fertilizer that will be needed to replace the removed nutrients, Jasa said. This will have to be replaced over the long-term to protect productivity, and it doesn't include the loss of carbon from the soil system as residue is removed, possibly reducing organic matter.

Removing that residue also increases soil water evaporation and will take away about 3 to 5 inches of soil moisture.

"Residue conserves soil moisture and removing that residue opens up the soil to evaporation," Jasa said. "On irrigated fields, that is more water that will have to be put on that field, and on dryland fields, that is just moisture lost and reduced yields."

While Jasa says he isn't against selling corn stover, he feels that the current price being offered is too low.

For more information about harvesting crop residue, watch the Oct. 9 edition of "Market Journal" at http://marketjournal.unl.edu/100909 or visit Crop Watch, UNL Extension's crop production newsletter, at http://cropwatch.unl.edu/web/cropwatch/archive?articleID=1503245 which also contains additional resources on harvesting crop residue.


Click for related articles Crop removal in higher yield environments
South Dakota wine industry growing
Predicting the environmental effects of transgenic Bt crop lines
Alert: Corn should be checked before feeding livestock
Coping with moldy corn
Harvest progresses; Nov. 13 estimate puts crop losses at $309 million

Comments on Articles article 2009- 48 - 1028UNLsellingcornstoverko.cfm
Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


208 Recommend | 0 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2011.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ






Canola U registration
Harvest Heroes ad




Inside Futures

Editorial Archives
<