|
|
|
AdvertisementAdaptation and evolutionBy John Schlageck Kansas Farm Burea Some ideas championed by environmental groups have been less than kind to agriculture. They have bombarded the public with figures on soil loss, pesticide-related mishaps and alleged failed attempts at using pesticides to reduce infestation. Their figures are oftentimes unverifiable. Technology has often been labeled the No. 1 environmental enemy by some of these environmental groups. Food producers, farmers and ranchers, view technology as the application of knowledge. As humans, we survive by adapting the environment to our needs. Take away technology and man would be just like other primates--confined to tropical regions and subject to extinction due to environmental changes. To survive and progress, we must disturb the environment, conserve resources and continually produce new food and fiber. Some would argue that resources are made not born and I agree. Land, ores, petroleum, etc.--the raw materials of our planet--are not inherent resources. They do not inherently further human purposes. Man determines what is useful and how to use it. Topsoil becomes a resource when a farmer tills the soil and plants wheat seed, for example. Ores become resources when metals are extracted from them. During the past two centuries, technology has been creating resources more rapidly than humans have been consuming them. By every measure of price and availability, resources have become more abundant. Without science and technology today's farmers and ranchers would be unable to feed the masses outside of the agricultural industry. Farmers use technology responsibly. They constantly learn new farming methods and practices by attending training sessions and courses. Using minimum and no-till farming practices and incorporating grass waterways and buffer strips, farmers have improved water quality and increased wildlife habitat. But new farm technology is expensive. It is in the best interest of farmers to use it carefully and sparingly. Misuse would add to the cost of production, which would result in an even lower return on their investment. Food produced in the United States is safe. More than four decades of Food and Drug Administration testing has shown the majority of our fruits and vegetables have no detectable pesticide residues. This underscores that American farmers use pesticides properly. Countless laws help ensure our food is safe. Billions of dollars annually are spent to support food and agricultural safety and quality inspection. The private sector, combined with state and local governments spend additional billions on similar activities. Farmers and ranchers support efforts to evaluate and enhance the current regulatory and food monitoring system. Agricultural producers want to work with all parties toward maintaining safe food, but this industry and our society must avoid policy changes that are based solely on fear or false information. Decisions affecting the course of agricultural production in the future are critically important and will have far reaching implications on our quality of life. We must be careful in determining long-term policies. Farmers and ranchers must continue to maximize their production capacity with an ever-watchful eye on food safety, quality and the environment. So by all means lets have this conversation about food safety and public health. Let's also make sure this conversation is complete, fair and factual. Advertisement
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2009. High Plains Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com |
Market Snapshot Inside Futures |
61271