FDAtoimplementfeedbandespit.cfm FDA to implement feed ban despite public objections
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal
Commerical Hay Equipment For The Farm
Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizer

Farm Survey

Journal Getaways

Reader Comment:
by ohio bo

"An excellent essay on fairs that brought back many memories for me. In my part"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

FDA to implement feed ban despite public objections

The National Cattlemen's Beef Association criticized a decision by the Food and Drug Administration to proceed with implementation of a new feed ban on April 27, despite numerous objections from farmers, ranchers, states, and members of Congress.

"This decision is extremely disappointing," says Dr. Elizabeth Parker, Chief Veterinarian for NCBA. "By going ahead with implementation of this unnecessary ban, the FDA is ignoring the substantial costs and environmental burdens it imposes on America's cattle producers."

For years, the livestock industry has made it clear to FDA and the Administration that this rule would exacerbate the problems producers are already facing regarding carcass disposal.

In fact, as early as December 2008, NCBA and producers across the country began voicing concerns about increased costs and disposal issues as many renderers discontinued their services in anticipation of this ban. "Unless FDA provides solutions for these problems, delaying the compliance date is an empty gesture," says Parker.

FDA is establishing a compliance date of Oct. 26 to give renderers additional time to comply with the new regulations and allow producers more time to identify appropriate methods of disposal. However, they have not provided any means to resolve the disposal issues created by the rule.

"This amounts to an unfunded mandate," Parker continues. "FDA has acknowledged that this rule creates tremendous disposal issues for producers, yet they have not identified any viable solutions to that problem. Moving forward with implementation without addressing these concerns is irresponsible."

In a pre-publication of the final rule, FDA said that "the underlying bases for these new measures were fully considered through the notice and rulemaking process." Yet the FDA never completed a risk assessment to determine the costs and benefits of the new feed ban.

"The rule creates significant costs and environmental problems, and has no demonstrable benefit," Parker explains. "Our existing feed ban has proven highly successful in limiting bovine spongiform encephalopathy in the U.S. herd."

Since 1997, the U.S. has prohibited ruminant feed from including parts of other ruminants. This proactive "ruminant to ruminant" feed ban, combined with other government and industry safeguards, is responsible for the extremely low level risk of BSE in the U.S. This was confirmed by years of robust USDA surveillance and reaffirmed by the U.S. "BSE Controlled Risk" designation by the OIE, the international animal health standard setting body.

For more information, see NCBA's April 7 press release: http://www.beefusa.org/NEWSFDAIgnoringEnvironmentalandEconomicImpactsofFeedBan38212.aspx.

To see FDA's pre-publication of the confirmation of the effective date of the final rule, visit: Federal Register Home.

Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com


Archives Search

NCBA Convention

United Sorghum Checkoff Program

Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives