Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Auction Calendar
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by mdill

"we love love.. the poems.. when a new one comes we gather up and have"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


ICON cattlemen meet in Dierks' office

Nebraska

A pre-hearing meeting Feb. 23 in Senator Cap Dierks office brought together several agriculture groups to discuss LB 585, the Bovine Thrichomoniasis bill.

Chris Abbott and David Wright represented the Independent Cattlemen of Nebraska along with Jerry Stodola and ICON lobbyist Jim Pappas.

The morning meeting brought ICON, the Nebraska Cattlemen, Nebraska Farm Bureau, Nebraska Farmers Union, Nebraska Livestock Market Association and the Nebraska Veterinary Medical Association. The Nebraska Department of Agriculture and the office of the State Veterinarian were not able to attend.

The formal hearing was held Feb. 24, but positive input by the farm organizations in Dierk's office on Feb. 23 contributed valuable information to be presented at the hearing.

Three main areas of interest were expressed by all the groups.

Concern about notification of neighbors was the first discussion topic. Current laws were questioned and what actions were required when reporting diseases. Liability worries for neighbors were voiced.

Next, the farming groups questioned what authority the state vet has in these situations. They also asked what information is shared with practicing vets and how information is gathered from the state labs and out-of-state labs. Another concern is just what kind of specific information is available to the state and would producers' herds be identified.

The third area explored was the proof of slaughter of infected bulls. Many wondered if it is required now to prove the slaughter of infected animals and were jaw brands used for identification. Other questions included what actions were currently taken to assist Nebraska livestock markets contain Trich.

It was agreed by all, the voiced concerns would be asked of the Department of Agriculture during the hearing held by the Ag Committee on Feb. 24.

The cattlemen represented Feb. 23 are not interested in seeing a mandatory program created from the LB 585 legislation. The bill was originally written to bring all interested parties to the table to see what can be done in the cattle industry to contain this disease.

"This legislation, today, is brought for the benefit of cattlemen, veterinarians, regulators, and auction market operators," said Dierks in his testimony at the hearing on Feb. 24. "These folks all have the same concern, that of the availability of information on animals diagnosed with Trich should be open and shared information on the presence of the disease and that is absolutely essential for control of the infection on the local level, as well as the state level."


Click for related articles Beef price recovery in 2010 depends on U.S. economy and exports, MU FAPRI economist tells herd owner
Checkoff programs geared at moving middle meats
ICON cattlemen meet in Dierks' office
Low milk prices lead to death of dairy cows
March cattle on feed numbers released
Minnesota beef producers win NCBA competition

Comments on Articles article 2009- 14 - ICONcattlemenmeetinDierksof.cfm
Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


292 Recommend | 0 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2011.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ





Cattlemens Beef Board

Canola U registration
Harvest Heroes ad




Inside Futures

Editorial Archives