NCBAwithdrawsfromFoodBefore.cfm NCBA withdraws from Food Before Fuel Coalition
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal
Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizer



Farm Survey


AgriMartin
Journal Getaways


Reader Comment:
by Wheat_Harvest movie

"Thanks so much for the article! These are the types of people we hope to"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

NCBA withdraws from Food Before Fuel Coalition

Remains committed to ensuring open markets for corn and feedstocks

The National Cattlemen's Beef Association announced March 13 that as part of a revamped strategy to eliminate government intervention in the renewable energy market, it is withdrawing as a member of the Food Before Fuel Coalition.

"The Food Before Fuel Coalition has been a good partner in our efforts to raise awareness about the harmful impacts of the government's excessive subsidization of the ethanol industry," says Gary Voogt, President of NCBA and rancher from Marne, Mich. "As the Coalition's work broadens, however, we remain focused on a single goal: ensuring a level playing field for our cattle producers."

Since January of 2008, cattle feeders have lost a staggering $4 billion because of high feed costs. Tough economic times combined with high corn prices and increased input costs have forced many producers to reduce their herd sizes.

A report released by the Congressional Research Service in September of 2008 shows the dramatic increase in production costs in the past years. According to the report, "the main driver was feed, which may account for 60 percent to 70 percent of total livestock production costs in any given year. Overall, total U.S. feed expenses were forecast to reach a record-high $48 billion in 2008, a jump of nearly $10 billion or 26 percent over 2007--a year that was $6.7 billion higher than 2006."

"Soaring feed costs and government payments to the ethanol industry are hurting small businesses and family ranches," Voogt explains. "Cattle producers don't ask for subsidies, just equal footing."

NCBA is working to level the playing field for America's cattle producers by reducing or eliminating the three government interventions for the ethanol industry: the renewable fuels mandate, the blender's tax credit, and the import tariff.

NCBA continues to support a market-based approach for the production and usage of ethanol. Our members and producers know that the marketplace offers many adequate risk management tools to utilize when building an industry. Government interventions via mandates and subsidies are never substitutes for good business practices.

"Our organization has a long history of advocacy for scientific research and development of promising new technologies," Voogt stated. "We support the development of alternative and renewable energy sources that do not compete with livestock for feed."

NCBA continues to support an open and free market as the best driver of competition and innovation in all industries, including the renewable energy sector.

"After 30 years of support, corn-based ethanol is still reliant on government subsidies to be commercially viable," Voogt says. "It is time to stop propping up this industry at the expense of cattle producers."



Google
 
Web hpj.com

Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

 

Archives Search







Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives