Vilsackcallsforstricterfood.cfm Vilsack calls for stricter food labels
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal
Commerical Hay Equipment For The Farm
Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizer

Farm Survey

Journal Getaways

Reader Comment:
by Eliza Winters

"I think that the new emission standards are a great move. I think that the"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Vilsack calls for stricter food labels

WASHINGTON (AP)--The Obama administration is calling for stricter labels on fresh meat and other foods that would show more clearly where an animal or food came from.

The move came as Obama prepares to visit Canada--a longtime opponent of the so-called "country-of-origin" labels--on Feb. 19. Both Canada and Mexico have protested the labeling in a complaint to the World Trade Organization.

Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack told consumer groups, farm groups and meat industry leaders Feb. 17 that he will ask the meat industry to voluntarily follow stricter guidelines for new package labels designed to specify a food's country of origin. The U.S. Department of Agriculture abruptly canceled a scheduled announcement of the decision Feb. 18, with little explanation.

In calling for the stricter guidelines, the Obama administration would be breaking from rules announced by the USDA shortly before President George W. Bush left office. Supporters of the labeling law--first enacted in a wide-ranging farm bill last year--were not happy with the Bush administration's version of the rules, which they said allowed meat companies to be vague about where an animal was born, raised and slaughtered.

If the industry does not comply with the stricter guidelines, the administration will write new rules, according to those who spoke with Vilsack on Feb. 17.

The labeling requirements, which would apply to fresh meats and some perishable fruits and vegetables, have long been debated in Congress. While the meat industry and retailers responsible for the labels have protested the changes--saying they are burdensome and could lead to higher prices--consumer groups and northern state ranchers who compete with the Canadian beef industry favor them.

All sides worked out a compromise during debate over the farm bill last year, but much of the law was left open to interpretation by the USDA.

According to those on the call, including Jean Halloran of Consumers Union and Patty Lovera of Food and Water Watch, Vilsack said he would like to see labels that would give consumers a clearer idea about the origin of the animal or food.

Vilsack also said the law should cover more foods, Halloran and Lovera said. Many foods that are defined as "processed"--roasted peanuts, for example, or cured bacon--are exempt from the law, but Vilsack proposed narrowing that definition.

Lovera said she was encouraged by the proposals, which Vilsack said he would lay out in a letter to the meat industry Feb. 18.

"The bottom line is we think people have a right to know and they can act on it based on their own opinions and preferences," she said.

Some of the law's leading opponents have been grocery stores and large meatpacking companies--many of which mix U.S. and Mexican beef--and other businesses involved in getting products to supermarkets.


Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email:


Archives Search

NCBA Convention

United Sorghum Checkoff Program

Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives