Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

Auction Calendar
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Pamela Drew

"Lost in your lament over export obsticles is the basic truth that repeated claims of"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


EPA administrator Jackson orders review of key Clean Air document

The Environmental Protection Agency Feb. 17 granted a petition for reconsideration of a Bush Administration memo regarding the scope of the Clean Air Act. The interpretive memo, put forward by then-EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson in December 2008, addresses when the Prevention of Significant Deterioration program applies to carbon dioxide, a chief greenhouse gas.

Concerns were soon raised about the memo's potential impact on American communities and neighborhoods. The Sierra Club and other parties in early January petitioned EPA to reconsider the Johnson memorandum.

"I am granting this petition because we must learn more about how this memo affects all relevant stakeholders impacted by its provisions," said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson "This will be a fair, impartial and open process that will allow the American public and key stakeholders to review this memorandum and to comment on its potential effects on communities across the country. EPA's fundamental mission is to protect human health and the environment and we intend to do just that."

EPA will vigorously review the Johnson memo to ensure that it is consistent with the Obama Administration's climate change strategy and interpretation of the Clean Air Act. While conducting this review, EPA will abide by the three core principles outlined by Administrator Jackson: overwhelming transparency, adherence to the rule of law, and science-based policies and regulations.

To facilitate a transparent, impartial and fair review, EPA will seek comment from the general public on this memo and its potential impact on American communities. This public comment period is consistent with the recommendations of the Environmental Appeals Board and allows for a measured, inclusive approach to reviewing this memo. The EAB last year held that EPA had not adequately articulated why its interpretation of the PSD program did not apply to carbon dioxide.

The action is the latest in a series of steps intended to ensure EPA policies and procedures are consistent with EPA's overall mission to protect human health and the environment.

The response letter to the Sierra Club: http://www.epa.gov/air/nsr/guidance.html.


Click for related articles On-farm energy--can we make it work?
Texas researchers provide emissions data for livestock industry
New ODAFF web tool helps determine which businesses are affected by coming EPA rule
Pesticide disposal offered in Bryan, Ottawa and Garfield counties
South Carolina family farm wins National Environment Award
Water rush: Deep aquifers sought for metro growth

Comments on Articles article 2009- 10 - EPAadministratorJacksonorde.cfm
Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


280 Recommend | 0 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2011.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ






Canola U registration
Harvest Heroes ad




Inside Futures

Editorial Archives