Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

High Plains Journal for Kindle
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Jeannette

"It was inevitable that someone as dedicated and as talented as Shannon Schur would take"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


Ranchers- Government discriminates against cattle

DAYVILLE, Ore. (AP)--To protect fish, the U.S. government discriminates against cows but lets elk and wild horses do whatever they want even if the wild beasts do at least as much damage to sensitive streams.

Or so say Dayville cattle ranchers Loren and Piper Stout.

Last year, after a lawsuit from environmental groups, a court ordered the two and others to remove their cattle from U.S. Forest Service land along Murderers Creek and its tributaries until the suit is resolved.

The creeks are home to middle Columbia River steeled protected by the Endangered Species Act.

Now the Stouts say they will sue the Forest Service, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and other agencies under the federal act.

Those agencies are allowing wild horse and elk populations to swell, their notice says, and those beasts trample the creek bank, too.

The Stouts staked out grazing lands last year when there were no cattle allowed and found the wild horses and elk trampled banks more than cattle, said Loren Stout, 52.

Forty creased sites violated the governments bank alternation standards, Stout said.

Meanwhile the wild steelhead run is doing beautifully, the notice says, and normal restrictions on grazing keep cattle out of the creeks at crucial times for fish.

"What we're trying to do is show how ludicrous this standard is," he said.

Western ranchers say environmental groups are singling them out. But Dave Becker, staff attorney for the Oregon Natural Desert Association, said science shows that cattle damage streams and harm fish.

Cows wallow in streams more than horses and elk, he said. And habitat in the Murderers Creek area has improved since the cattle were sent packing, said Beaker, whose group also is suing over the streamed grazing.

The Stouts' notice says the Forest Service is maintaining wild horses at a potentially harmful level, with the population in the Masher National Forest topping 500, more than five times the standard.

The Stouts say last winter the elk count around Murderers Creek was more than triple ODFWs objective of 4.9 per square mile.

Scott Horngren, their attorney, said the agencies need to better manage elk and horses. If the Stouts win, elk would have to be killed off in large numbers and mustangs likely would be relocated.

But the overriding goal, he said, is to get the agencies to realize that bank trampling shouldn't automatically mean damage to fish.

2/9/09
All Editions\16-A

Date: 1/23/09


Click for related articles New ISU summary outlines latest air quality, odor research
Ranchers- Government discriminates against cattle
Texas cattle producers facing 'perfect storm' of challenges
USMEF- Beef, pork exports continue to exceed 2007 pace
Hay movement slows in some areas
Hay trading slow to moderate

Comments on Articles article 2009- 6 - Ranchers-Governmentdiscrimi.cfm
Reader Comments
jools — 10/04/2009 05:10:40
Cattle cause a lot more problems with the land than horses we have seen this in Australia!!!!

Reader Comments
ellieroo — 10/02/2009 06:10:49
Over 49 yrs I've been in alot of nooks and crannies of Oregon have yet to see all these destructive wild horses! Lots of cows a few elk and deer but not one wild horse!

Reader Comments
Suzanne — 10/01/2009 07:10:46
That's absolutely true. It's right there in the GAO report! It has been proven in study after study that horses cause much less damage to a range than cattle and sheep.

You can claim whatever you want, but the facts speak for themselves. I'm a tax payer, and I don't want cattle destroying MY public land. The BLM is making money with grazing leases, while you ranchers get to use public land for a pittance.

It's way past time to get real on this issue.

Reader Comments
Barbwire — 10/01/2009 06:10:14
A 1990 GAO study proved cattle, not wild horses , damage the range and riparian areas. Wild horses wander to graze while cattle stay in an area. Also cattle stay in riparian areas and eat the vegetation along the banks. They also defecate in the water and horses do not. This causes water pollution with E. Coli and algae which kill fish and other species.

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.


527 Recommend | 4 Comments

Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2011.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ





Cattlemens Beef Board

Canola U registration
Harvest Heroes ad




Inside Futures

Editorial Archives
1328879547343