|
|
CCA offers opinion on wolf recoveryColorado WildEarth Guardians filed a petition under the Endangered Species Act and the Administrative Procedure Act requesting that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service develop a recovery plan for wolves in the Southern Rocky Mountains--an expansive region including much of western Colorado, northern New Mexico and south central Wyoming. The petition also calls on the FWS to designate critical habitat for the species in the Southern Rockies. There are two basic reasons for the CCA's opposition to reintroduction of Wolves into the Southern Rocky Mountain Ecosystem: 1.) We believe that the introduction is driven by the faulty assumption that the presence of the wolf is necessary for healthy ecosystem function. We would suggest that any healthy ecosystem has the capability of adapting to the constant change under which it exists. Constant perturbation is the norm for an ecological system and, in fact, systems are dependent upon these perturbations for proper functioning. Whether wildfire, disease, or the constant ebb and flow of predator/prey populations; ecological systems possess the inherent capacity to evolve with environmental fluctuation. As one component of the system wanes, others quickly fill the void. We believe that the current site of larger predators including the mountain lion, black bear, coyote, lynx and humans can be effectively managed to appropriately contain prey species within carrying capacities. This may require some shift in our current sport hunting philosophies, but it is certainly within our capabilities. 2.) We continue to remain concerned over the high potential for conflict with wolf/human interactions. Particularly problematic are interactions between wolf populations and domestic livestock populations. It is our understanding that where other wolf reintroduction efforts have and are being done; the ranching community has, for the most part, not been totally satisfied with the resolutions of the conflicts. For example, the simple reimbursement of current market value for an animal lost to wolves does not take into consideration the loss of reproductive capacities from a well-developed gene pool or the economic loss experienced by the necessity of having to relocate an entire herd as the result of denning activity by wolves. The potential for serious conflict between dogs, whether kept for sport hunting or as family pets, must be considered. This is particularly true in the southern Rockies where humans, engaged in recreational activities on federal lands, have demonstrated a marked proclivity for having dogs as companion animals. Based upon these two areas of concern, we remain opposed to the reintroduction of wolves into the Southern Rocky Mountain Ecoregion. We wonder whether or not the effort needed to address the potential problems associated with reintroduction is sound public policy, especially in light of the questionable "need" for this particular predator in this ecosystem. 10/13/08 Date: 10/8/08
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2011. High Plains Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com |
|
