Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal


AgriMartin

High Plains Journal online store


2008 Farm Publication Editorial Poll

Place HPJ classified ad

Reader Comment:
by bkp1
"Great article! I like the fact that a program is in place that not only"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Research finds need for standardized streambank evaluations to assess livestock impact

The use of streambank alteration to evaluate livestock management in riparian areas is subject to four variables that may affect its accuracy, according to a new study.

The study results are presented in an article in the November 2008 issue of Rangeland Ecology & Management, "Evaluating Livestock Grazing Use With Streambank Alteration Protocols: Challenges and Solutions," written by Jeremiah D. Heitke, Richard C. Henderson, Brett B. Roper, and Eric K. Archer.

"Although measurements of streambank alteration are relatively repeatable by different observers, results were affected by several factors not directly related to grazing intensity," according to the article. These factors are training, professional background, location and intensity of measurements, and protocol used.

The study evaluated streambank alteration in 10 fall-grazing areas on land managed by the U.S. Forest Service in 2003 and 2004 in western Montana. The two evaluated protocols in 2004 were greenline (GL) and greenline precise (GLP), which measure disturbance along a line centered on the greenline and perpendicular to the stream channel.

After the observers received training, the researchers found that the consistency of site evaluations improved.

"Given the higher means and variability associated with untrained observers, assessing streambank alteration with untrained observers could seriously undermine the credibility of land management based on those assessments," according to the article.

The researchers recommend using independent, trained technicians to provide the training. They also found that the chosen protocol could affect the observers' results. While GL took an average of 30 minutes, GLP required about 60 minutes but generally was more accurate.

"Specialists need to understand how the choice of protocol, level of training, and professional background affect these estimates," the researchers write. They also caution that because no protocol is error-fre e, managers should be careful when making a decision based on a single assessment.

To read the entire article, visit: http://www3.allenpress.com/pdf/RAMA-61-6-5028-61-6-647.pdf.


None\0-

Date: 12/19/08


Advertisement
Click for related articles Appeal filed in poultry litter case
Baucus urges Hanoi to lift restrictions on U.S. beef
Bison baby thinks she's a horse
Bison roundup shows species' recovery on prairie
Cattle on feed numbers released
CDA names new state veterinarian

Comments on Articles article 2008- 53 - Researchfindsneedforstandar.cfm

Article: Research finds need for standardized streambank evaluations to assess livestock impact

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.

116 Recommend | 0 Comments


Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2009.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com



Market Snapshot

Inside Futures
Editorial Archives

Browse Archives

Researchfindsneedforstandar.cfm --->