Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal


AgriMartin

High Plains Journal online store


2008 Farm Publication Editorial Poll

Place HPJ classified ad

Reader Comment:
by dmgsouth
"It's a good thing they are talking about the human factor. Hasn't this always been"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

SDSGA questions State Brand Board

South Dakota

South Dakota Stockgrowers Association questions the fact that the State Brand Board, which is comprised of 5 members, does not have fair representation of the Stockgrowers.

Buffalo, S.D., rancher and SDSGA President, Larry Nelson said "Given the history of the Stockgrowers it would be appropriate to have more than one member who pays dues to the SD Stockgrowers. I believe the viewpoint of the Stockgrowers deserves stronger representation on this board."

The history of brand inspection is forever tied to the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association which goes back to the late 1800s when several producers decided to form an organization to utilize the brand as ownership recognition and as a theft deterrent. They called this organization the Black Hill Stockgrowers Association, later changed to the Western South Dakota Stockgrowers Association and finally evolved into the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association.

Since that time the Stockgrowers Association has either provided the brand inspection service or contracted with the State Brand Board to provide it, until July 1, 2008 when the State of South Dakota declined the Stockgrowers bid for the contract. The final bid from the Stockgrowers was to conduct the entire inspection program for the amount of the inspection fee which was 80 cents per head. Stockgrowers offered that bid with the understanding that they would stand the loss or take the gain.

Past President Rick Fox stated "The Brand Board should be elected as representatives from districts that are geographically balanced within the Brand Inspection Area, instead of being appointed by the Executive branch of state government."

Fox continued "If the producers had a voice in the makeup of the SD State Brand Board, we would have an improved balance of producer needs and concerns."

Rick said "It is obvious the present administration is not willing to support the producers in the brand area who are affiliated with the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association. "He further stated "we need to make changes, legislatively and administratively in order to be recognized.

12/22/08
4 Star NE\10-B

Date: 12/17/08


Advertisement
Click for related articles Beef plant facing 2 more liens
Feed grains marketing workshop scheduled Jan. 7 to 8 in Amarillo
NCBA's Cattlemen to Cattlemen to celebrate 100th episode Dec. 30
Tyson Foods signs new lender agreement
EPA exempts farms from reporting toxic fumes
Horse processing is a private property issue, Stenholm says

Comments on Articles article 2008- 52 - SDSGAquestionsStateBrandBoa.cfm

Article: SDSGA questions State Brand Board

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.

104 Recommend | 0 Comments


Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2009.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com



Market Snapshot

Inside Futures
Editorial Archives

Browse Archives

SDSGAquestionsStateBrandBoa.cfm --->