Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal


AgriMartin

High Plains Journal online store


2008 Farm Publication Editorial Poll

Place HPJ classified ad

Reader Comment:
by realitycheck
"Wow this article must have been right on to have activated the animal rights crowd"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

Horse processing is a private property issue, Stenholm says

By Doug Rich


Former Congressman Charles Stenholm said the horse slaughter issue is a private property issue. Stenholm spoke on the horse processing issue at the Kansas Livestock Association annual convention held Dec. 4 and 5 in Wichita, Kan. No matter how a person feels about horse processing, Stenholm said no one has the right to tell another person what to do with their private property. (Journal photo by Doug Rich.)

The horse slaughter issue is a private property issue according to former U.S. Rep. Charles Stenholm, D-TX, who was a featured speaker at the 96th annual Kansas Livestock Association convention held Dec. 4 and 5 in Wichita, Kan.

Stenholm said he has become the unofficial spokesperson for this controversial issue after working with over 200 horse and livestock associations. Stenholm said most people in the livestock industry know that horses are livestock and that something has to be done with unwanted horses.

"We have tried to make it clear to those horse owners that do not believe their horses should be processed and consumed in another country--for human consumption--that we agree with them that their horse is private property," Stenholm said. "No one should tell you what to do with your private property, other than treat it humanely," Stenholm said.

The livestock industry has been derelict in its duty by not being more pro-active regarding how they treat their animals. Stenholm said the industry needs to get its message on the evening news a little more often.

"We need to at least counter the Humane Society and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) with their view of the world, which is perfectly honest from their point of view, and I accept that," Stenholm said. "I respect the right of people to differ with my opinion."

There are groups out there that want to change agriculture, and they are using issues like horse processing to accomplish that goal. Stenholm said these people don't like what has been accomplished by agriculture, which is to provide the most abundant, safest, and highest quality food supply in the world.

"Are we perfect? No," Stenholm said. "Do we make mistakes? Yes. Do we correct our mistakes? Yes, we do."

Stenholm said if people want to classify horses as pets then they should be ready for Congress to take away the tax deductions for horses as livestock. If horses are no longer livestock, what is the basis for a tax deduction as a business expense?

When Congress passed the ban that closed the last three horse processing plants in this country, Stenholm said they were warned about the problem of what to do with all of the unwanted horses. There are 120,000 unwanted horses in this country and that number grows by 4,000 to 5,000 head a year, according to Stenholm. It is costing taxpayers $50 million a year to maintain feedlots full of unwanted horses. Even horse sanctuaries are full and running out of money.

"With all due respect to T. Boone Pickens and his wife--who want to save all of the wild horses--they have to be placed on somebody's land at somebody's expense," Stenholm said. "Most of it will be at taxpayers' expense."

An unintended consequence of the ban on horse processing in this country has been to cut off a supply of horse meat for zoo animals. Meat eating animals in zoos around the country historically have been fed horse meat. Now zoo managers are forced to import horse meat at twice the cost, just as most zoos are struggling to survive financially.

Local officials around the country are struggling with how to deal with abandoned horses.

"It is one thing to deal with unwanted cats or dogs. But what do you do with unwanted horses?" Stenholm said.

"This is a legitimate issue, but let's talk about it in the realm of common sense," Stenholm said. "Why can't we turn a food resource, that some people in the world do eat, into something they can use?"

Doug Rich can be reached by phone at 785-749-5304 or by e-mail at richhpj@aol.com.

12/22/08
1 Star WK\16-B

Date: 12/18/08


Click for related articles Thune says cattle exemption bill in the works
Todd Allen begins year as president of KLA
Tough times ahead for cattle producers
USMEF- U.S. pork, beef exports defy expectations
WSGA/WWGA joint resolutions adopted at Winter Convention
Horse processing is a private property issue, Stenholm says

Comments on Articles article 2008- 52 - Horseprocessingisaprivatepr.cfm
Reader Comments
annielou — 12/21/2008 08:12:23
Thanks Vicki and it WAS good news that Tom Vilsack WAS confirmed as Sec. of AG. LOL.

Reader Comments
vicki — 12/20/2008 06:12:13
Tractorguy, you take the time to jump on a poster to say they already made the appointment instead of jumping on all the false and inaccurate drivel in this article. Did you ever think that maybe it was a typo and she was saying to think he WAS being considered.

It doesn't matter because with SLAUGHTERGATE, the end is near for horse slaughter. The pro slaughter lies have come home to roost. The facts are irrefutable. 906 pages of facts directly from the USDA. What will be interesting is to see what lies the pro slaughter folks will try to use for damage control. Have you read the report or watched the news report?


Reader Comments
TractorGuy — 12/20/2008 05:12:54
Hey annielou...

Do you actually read the High Plains Journal or just spam its website with your hollier than thou crap. Come up for air and read the articles, you'll find Obama has already selected a Sec of Ag, and it ain't Stenholm.

Reader Comments
annielou — 12/20/2008 05:12:36
Congress passed the ban? And taxpayers are paying for horses in feedlots?

Furthering his agenda by spreading lies, that's what this man is doing.

To think Stenholm is being considered for Secretary of Agriculture is more than scary.

Reader Comments
vicki — 12/20/2008 12:12:35
Another blow to the pro slaughter advocates. Read and view the KHOU TV news report on Slaughtergate here: http://www.vickitobin.com/id24.html

Reader Comments
mjwilson4978 — 12/19/2008 08:12:01
Starving, or abandoning an animal is a crime. People have the option of sending their horse to auction/slaughter (just call the knacker), giving it away, selling it to a private party, donating it, or euthanizing it, nothing has changed, to say it has is a lie. Over-breeding is the problem, and we know who the culperts are, the QHA, per USDA stats, 90+% of all horses slaughtered for human consumption are of QH type. Stop promoting over-breeding QHA, it's not OK anymore than puppymilling. QH colt's are constantly going to slaughter, what's with these people??? Stop breeding, that's the problem, just because an animal has a uterus doesn't mean you have to breed it.
The latest 900 pages and a video of US horse slaughterhouse abuses have just been released from the USDA because the Animal Angels filed a FOIA which took 3 years for the USDA to release them, after seeing it, it's no wonder. Here's the link for all to view and see that humane slaughter in the US is non-existent, and for anyone to think that things would change because we allow horse slaughter to start again in the US is crazy. Go see http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/horsemeat/foia.htm
To allow horseslaughter in the US again will allow the American hating, non-tax paying, elite foreigners to operate on our tax money, never will I allow this, I will fight them to my dieing day. They bring corruption, horse stealing, inhumane treatment of horses, and ruin our rivers and towns, such as Kaufman Tx., look it up and see what great neighbors they make. They suck us dry. Look at Cavel and Dallas Crown, they had dumped pollutants in the river, didn't pay fines, Cavel had paid off city council members, and never did pay the 75,000.00 in fines, uh, you or me would be in jail. I'm sick to death of people saying that we need horseslaughter in the US, they don't want to know the truth, it's all about money, supply and demand. More horses have been slaughtered this year than last, so it sounds like business as usual for the QHA. Go figure. There's an excess of dogs and cats, why don't we start a slaughterhouse for them, they're private property like horses, and the Asia would be thrilled, what's the difference? Get real people. HORSE SLAUGHTER HAS NOT ENDED IN AMERICA PEOPLE, Beltex in Fort Worth is killing for zoos. I wouldn't be surprised at all if pro's were'nt turning horses loose. Large animals besides horses are being starved, the pro's don't say anything about that, herds of dairy and other cattle are being found dead in NB, starved to death, now why would they do that when they have a market for them? Duh, abusive and cruel people. I've owned horses for 40 years and never used slaughter to "get RID" of them. Stenholm is a paid lobbyist, paid by the cattlemen and laboratories who torture animals.

Reader Comments
blueprints — 12/19/2008 04:12:00
I am definitely sure that if you're selling a horse for slaughter for human consumption, then it has to be free of medications that BY LAW IN ALL FOOD ANIMALS cannot be injested by people. Hmmmm! This is not being done in the US -- we do not raise horse as food animals (private property or otherwise). What does that mean? That BY OUR OWN US LAWS horses cannot be slaughtered for human consumption.

Now Mr. Stenholm, I recently read an article where you were quoted saying that your highest concern was the safety of American food. I dare you to stand by your words in regards to slaughtering American horses with the medication issue I am addressing.
____________________________

Want some cancer with your horse meat?

Wouldn’t you think that if the US was slaughtering horse meat for human consumption that they’d have some sort of regulations about the medications that they receive so that the meat isn’t carcinogenic to the consumer? I thought they would – and should – too, but they don’t. While the US was slaughtering horses within our borders and now with US horses being slaughtered in Canada and Mexico for those same destinations, there was and are no regulations to ensure a safe product. Do the consumers know this? I highly doubt it.

In the US, the USDA gave their stamp of approval to thousands of horses destined for the EU, knowing full well the regulations that Europe has for its food products, and totally ignoring own food laws (illegal to have known carcinogens in food animals). Why do they not care? Is it because horse meat is not being eaten by US citizens? No wonder why we also have such a lack of trust and rejection of our US beef in the world market.

On top of it all, American horse meat is often marketed in foreign countries as if it were organic – free-range and grass-fed. In reality, the customers are getting quite the opposite – meat from horses that are traumatized, often inhumanely killed, ex-pets, ex-work horses, ex-race horses, all states of pregnancy, regardless of care, regardless of feeding practices (or lack thereof), regardless of health, regardless of transport practices, regardless of medications …

Why is American horse meat unsafe for human consumption?

* Horses are not raised nor regulated as food animals in the US . They routinely receive medications that are banned from food animals such as Phenybutazone or "bute", the aspirin of the horse world. In fact, over 70% of legal horse medications are either illegal in food animals or have never been tested for human consumption and are simply labeled, “Not intended for use in horses intended for food.” If you’ve read any of the articles about US horse racing lately, you know how many drugs are in their systems. Steroids, lasix, etc. … With the slaughter houses own slogan, “Seven days from stable to table” you can see that no withdrawal times are being observed (note: there is no acceptable withdrawal time for bute).

What are the side-effects of bute?

* Phenylbutazone has been determined to be a carcinogen to humans by the National Toxicology Program (NTP).

* Phenylbutazone is also known for its ulcerogenic, nephrotoxic, and hemotoxic effects in humans. It is known to induce blood dyscrasias, including aplastic anemia, leukopenia, agranulocytosis, thrombocytopenia, and deaths.

Are the illegal substances found in US slaughter horses?

* Absolutely. According to the USDA’s Red Book, of the 66,183 horses slaughtered in 2004, 6.6% (4,268.08) horses were in violation for “bute” and 13.3% (8,802.34) were in violation of Penicillin. Of the 94,037 horses slaughtered in 2005, 11.1% (10,344.07) horses were in violation for “bute” and 25% (23,509.25) were in violation of Penicillin. Only small samples of 15 horses and 8 horses, respectively, were even tested. You can bet the other horses that were not tested got the USDA stamp of approval and were sent overseas, even though it is clearly illegal according to our own food laws and the laws of the European Union. This does not account for the vast majority of drugs that horses receive, as they are not required to test for those medications. The Red Book does not reflect any residue data for slaughter horses in 2006, which is the year that the horse slaughter industry paid the USDA inspectors themselves …

Note: The Food and Drug Administration has not approved the use of phenylbutazone in food-producing animals; therefore, there are no established withdrawal times on product labeling for food-producing species. Phenylbutazone is not permitted at any concentration (zero tolerance) in meat, milk, or eggs intended for human consumption.
http://www.usp.org/pdf/EN/veterinary/phenylbutazone.pdf

Reader Comments
vicki — 12/19/2008 03:12:47
Yes, it is a private property issue but an owner does not have the right to abuse their property. Horse slaughter is abuse and if there is any doubt, read the FIOA from the USDA on the Beltex plant here- www.vickitobin.com/id18.html.

As far as disposal, we already have laws on disposal. We cannot dispose of humans any we want, we cannot dispose of our cars or computers any way we want. Unfortunately, those without common sense need laws to educate them on right from wrong and how to humanely end a horse's life.

Reader Comments
blueprints — 12/19/2008 03:12:19
Ok, if my horse is classified as "livestock" then why am I paying tax on any food I buy for him? As I understand "food animals" are taxed upon slaughter. If your argument is that horses are "food" animals then why the double-standard? I guess horse owners need to ban together and protest being taxed when they shouldn't be, is that what you're saying Mr. Stenholm?

Reader Comments
TractorGuy — 12/19/2008 01:12:23
Yes you do. Need any help?

Article: Horse processing is a private property issue, Stenholm says

Add Your Comment
To post a comment on this story, enter your screen name and email address then click "Add Comment." Your email address will not be displayed.

255 Recommend | 12 Comments


Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2009.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com



Market Snapshot

Inside Futures
Editorial Archives

Browse Archives

Horseprocessingisaprivatepr.cfm --->