Governmentenforcementofanim.cfm Government enforcement of animal ID reminiscent of socialism
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal

High Plains Journal on Nook
Farm Survey

Reader Comment:
by Jeannette

"It was inevitable that someone as dedicated and as talented as Shannon Schur would take"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.


Government enforcement of animal ID reminiscent of socialism

The 135th Colorado State Fair has come to an end. Most will come away with good feelings, prizes won, and pride of quality livestock exhibited. Those chosen to be sold at the Junior Livestock Sale were financially well rewarded, and the excitement of the big once a year event will soon be history.

Unfortunately a black cloud came, then stayed, unwanted and ominous over the fair grounds in Pueblo.

Hiding behind this black cloud was the ugly face of European Union values, i.e. socialism.

You might ask, "Why would he suggest that?" Well, what I'm about to tell you is what I saw. And it wasn't pretty.

Because the packing industry controls the United States Department of Agriculture, we in the cattle industry are held tightly by its strong arm.

One of the many off-shoots of the packer control is implementation of a program called Premises Identification, and National Animal Identification System (NAIS).

Running cattle in two states that have brand laws, I've had opportunity to visit with their brand inspectors and state vets about such things as tracking and vaccine. It's very clear that they've had a solid hundred plus year history of being able to ably handle crisis just by simply "communicating" with one another and using the brands.

It's likely that having an additional step of "federal" would slow down and encumber the entire process to such extent that mortality would arise as the grave matter to deal with.

It's a given that with all this knowledge, the proposed Premises I.D. and NAIS was met with reasonable resistance from thinking cow-calf producers.

Furthermore, it was easy to see the pro-generators of this idea, was the packing industry, for it would ease their selling of USA meat products to foreign countries.

Probably because of the deep resistance to implement these I.D. programs, in 2006 U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns changed the once status of ""mandatory" to "voluntary."

Many though, knew the feds would not give up their charge of mandatory, and that it'd only be a matter of time before they'd return that program under a different guise. Unfortunately one would never have guessed they'd use our children to attempt crashing the gates of resistance.

Yet that's exactly what happened here in Colorado.

The federal government gave large moneyed grants to Colorado State University Extension, the FFA, and the Colorado Department of Agriculture, to route the animal I.D. as mandatory on our youth and their livestock.

The Colorado State Fair took it one step further by making mandatory premise I.D. on exhibitor entry forms . . . as a condition of showing.

I see two major problems with this idea. One, it's discriminatory, in that children who house their animal on property other than their parents would pose an unacceptable affront to the rightful property owners. Two, it forces children to register property they don't hold title to, which is against the law.

I wonder. What does this teach our children?

Some exhibitors were told using a valid premise I.D. from their county's fairgrounds was OK, only to harshly and unfairly learn later . . . they'd been misled.

This is where the black cloud of socialism showed up. Twelve youth exhibitors who had qualified for the junior livestock sale catalog, found their county fairgrounds I.D. was not only refused by fair officials, they were told to leave the fair grounds within 24 hours or be escorted off the grounds by the Sheriff's department.

Needless to say, these youngsters were crushed. Instead of reaping the reward of their year's work with their animal, they were treated like criminals.

Although they were offered a buy out and asked to remain silent about such (And some did.) I find using tax payer dollars a rather odd solution.

In visiting with one ousted, teary eyed youngster, she calmly stated, "Yes, they made me feel like some low human, but I will rise above them. I will not sink to their level."

Fair officials claim it took 30 days for them to identify and weed out the alleged offenders of their ruling.

This 30 day time frame will most likely repeat itself when the feds finally respond to veterinarians emergency vaccine requests.

Right here in your back yard, your tax dollars are being funneled through the U.S.D.A. to force our children to engage in illegal activities simply to appease the packing industry.

I can't believe our own federal government would use our children to get back at their law-abiding adult parents.

But as long as financial gains of mega oligopoly packer industry converts neatly into campaign contributions for any bureaucrat wanna be and trumps anything just, decent and good, socialism will be the only thing left. . . green. . . and growing.

--Chuck Sylvester, LaSalle, Colo.

Date: 9/5/07


Agriculture News from HPJ - Your Ag News Source
Google
 
Web hpj.com
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2012.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com

Search HPJ








Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives