Malatya Haber FDA wants to ban cow brains, spinal cords from all animal feed to prevent BSE
Home News Livestock Crops Markets Hay, Range & Pasture Home & Family Classifieds Resources This Week's Journal
Commerical Hay Equipment For The Farm
Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizer

Farm Survey

Journal Getaways

Reader Comment:
by Wheat_Harvest movie

"Thanks so much for the article! These are the types of people we hope to"....Read the story...
Join other discussions.

FDA wants to ban cow brains, spinal cords from all animal feed to prevent BSE

Proposal falls short of earlier FDA promises

"I'm disappointed that our government wouldn't want to remove 100 percent, given that there's emerging research that there may be more tissues that have infectivity."

--Linda Detwiler, former USDA veterinarian

WASHINGTON (AP)--Seeking to close a gap in the nation's defense against bovine spongiform encephalopathy, the Bush administration has proposed eliminating cow brains and spinal cords from feed for all animals, including chickens, pigs and pets.

The government already bans virtually all cattle remains from cattle feed. The new proposal from the Food and Drug Administration "will make an already small risk even smaller," acting FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach said Oct. 4.

The new proposal would reduce the risk of infection by 90 percent, said Stephen F. Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine. After a public comment period, the rules should take effect sometime next year, he said.

However, critics said the new proposal falls far short of what FDA had promised 19 months ago, after the nation's first case of BSE was confirmed. At that time, FDA said it would add three other items to the list of materials banned from cattle feed: Blood, restaurant plate waste and poultry litter. All are potential pathways for BSE.

The proposal announced Oct. 4 is designed to eliminate the need for banning chicken litter from cattle feed because chickens would no longer be fed cow brains and spinal cords, among the cattle parts most likely to contain BSE.

Contrary to FDA's previous plan, the new proposal does not ban cattle blood, often fed to calves as a milk replacer, or restaurant leftovers from cattle feed. It also doesn't ban chicken litter, which includes spilled feed as well as chicken manure, which scientists believe could contain BSE if the chickens had ingested tainted protein.

The feed rules are important because the only way cattle are known to get BSE is from eating feed containing contaminated cattle remains.

Ground-up cattle remains--leftovers from slaughtering operations--were used as protein in cattle feed until 1997, when Britain's outbreak prompted the U.S. to ban the use of those remains in cattle feed. The ban prohibited all cattle protein from being used in cattle feed, with the exceptions of poultry litter, plate waste and blood, which can contain cattle protein.

FDA's new proposal would ban from livestock feed the brain and spinal cord--tissues that can carry BSE--from cows older than 30 months. The age cutoff is specified because infection levels are believed to rise as cattle grow older.

The proposal does not include other tissues, such as eyes or part of the small intestine, considered "specified risk materials" by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which requires their removal from meat that people eat. FDA regulates animal feed.

Consumer groups and scientists said the government did not close all the loopholes because its new proposal bans just the brain and spinal cord of cattle 30 months and older and not all at-risk tissues, regardless of age, that could carry the disease.

Linda Detwiler, a former USDA veterinarian who led the department's work on BSE for several years, said removing 90 percent of the risk isn't good enough.

"I'm disappointed that our government wouldn't want to remove 100 percent, given that there's emerging research that there may be more tissues that have infectivity," she said.

Detwiler said the plan would still allow chicken, pig and pet feed to contain potentially infectious tissues from the highest-risk cattle, "downers" that can't walk and dead cows.

"There is no question that we should not be feeding the remains of any mammals to food animals, and by not closing this dangerous loophole, we are exposing the American public to unnecessary risk," said Michael Hansen, a biologist for Consumers Union.

Chris Waldrop, a spokesman for Consumer Federation of America, accused the agency of caving in to pressure from the meat industry.

The FDA's Sundlof countered that the Oct. 4 proposal "is much more protective" than the earlier proposal.

"By removing the brain and spinal cord, you've taken out 90 percent of the risk," he said, citing a risk assessment prepared by Harvard University researchers.

The meat industry applauded the new rules, saying a broader ban on at-risk tissues from cows of every age would have forced meatpackers to dispose of 1.4 billion pounds of materials annually.

The new plan "is the appropriate, science-based policy," said Jim Hodges, president of the meatpacking industry's American Meat Institute Foundation.

It will cost the industry about $14 million annually, according to FDA.

The new proposal would ban from livestock feed:

--Brains and spinal cords of cattle 30 months and older.

--Brains and spinal cords of all cattle not approved for human consumption.

--Entire carcasses of cattle not approved for human consumption, if brains and spinal cords have not been removed.

--Tallow derived from at-risk tissues, if it contains more than .15 percent impurities.

--Mechanically separated beef from at-risk materials identified in the new proposal.

Date: 10/12/05


Copyright 1995-2014.  High Plains Publishers, Inc.  All rights reserved.  Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at
High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email:


Archives Search

NCBA Convention

United Sorghum Checkoff Program

Inside Futures

Editorial Archives

Browse Archives