|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Test-remove brucellosis plan gets nodLANDER, Wyo. (AP)--Some elk near Pinedale would be slaughtered if they test positive for brucellosis under a plan crafted by a task force charged with helping Wyoming regain its brucellosis-free status. Members of the Wyoming Brucellosis Coordination Team made their last changes to a report headed for the governor's desk during a daylong meeting in Lander, Wyo., Dec. 15. The report includes the recommendation to test elk and kill those that test positive in a pilot program that involves a 5-mile fence and 8-foot-tall corral near Pinedale. One of the alterations to the plan Dec. 15 was to change the phrase "test and slaughter" to "test and remove." Critics called it simply an effort to tone down the fact that under the pilot program, elk that test positive for brucellosis will be slaughtered in an effort to prevent transmission of the disease from wildlife to livestock. Brucellosis causes cattle to abort. Wyoming has lost its valuable brucellosis-free status with the discovery of brucellosis in western Wyoming cattle. Given the public controversy over Montana slaughtering bison with brucellosis, what's going to happen when the public notices the slaughter of elk, Meredith Taylor, a representative of the Wyoming Outdoor Council, asked. "My mother told me there are no quick fixes, that solutions take time, hard work and give 'n' take," Taylor said. "I see a lot of giving by wildlife and not by agriculture." According to participants in the task force, the pilot program near Pinedale would systematically remove elk that test positive as a way to lower the presence of brucellosis in that herd. The pilot program is supposed to run for five years, remove no more than 10 percent of the herd, and have a 95 percent confidence level in reducing the presence of the brucellosis bacterium in the herd. Elk would be blocked from private ranchlands and access to traditional wintering grounds with the 5-mile fence. A corral-like holding area would allow wildlife managers to segregate and control the elk for testing, release or removal. Terry Cleveland, director of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, said the task force is also proposing working with ranchers to avoid commingling of livestock and wildlife, research on brucellosis vaccines and brucellosis testing throughout Wyoming. Of the seven elk herds in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem, one herd now has a plan designed for brucellosis eradication, yet six more herd plans need to be developed, he said. "It all depends on funding," Cleveland said, adding that the department needs $2.2 million to put the task force plans into place. State Sen. John Hines, R-Gillette, told fellow task force members that the proposed budget for brucellosis eradication faces tough sledding in the Legislature, especially because it involves money from the General Fund and would be an ongoing program. Other task force members urged one another to talk to their representatives and senators back home, to build support for the overall plan. Cathy Purves, a representative of Wyoming Wildlife Federation, said the task force supports the pilot program. She said that regarding the controversial issue of whether elk feedgrounds should be kept open or phased out, there will be majority and minority reports attached to the report for the governor. The task force report does not recommend closing the feedgrounds. The task force report will be presented to Gov. Dave Freudenthal on Jan. 5. Date: 12/21/04
Copyright/Privacy
Copyright 1995-2008. High Plains Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Any republishing of these pages, including electronic reproduction of the editorial archives or classified advertising, is strictly prohibited. If you have questions or comments you can reach us at High Plains Journal 1500 E. Wyatt Earp Blvd., P.O. Box 760, Dodge City, KS 67801 or call 1-800-452-7171. Email: webmaster@hpj.com |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||